Re: [Ieprep] Reasoning behind agenda

Ken Carlberg <K.Carlberg@cs.ucl.ac.uk> Fri, 28 June 2002 11:52 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id HAA21289 for <ieprep-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Jun 2002 07:52:51 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id HAA18726; Fri, 28 Jun 2002 07:50:43 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id HAA18694 for <ieprep@optimus.ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Jun 2002 07:50:42 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk (bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk [128.16.5.31]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id HAA21166 for <ieprep@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Jun 2002 07:49:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from posh.cs.ucl.ac.uk by bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk with local SMTP id <g.07164-0@bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk>; Fri, 28 Jun 2002 12:50:19 +0100
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 with version: MH 6.8.3 #25[UCI]
To: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
cc: ieprep@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Ieprep] Reasoning behind agenda
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 28 Jun 2002 01:19:56 PDT." <5.1.1.6.2.20020628011824.026e8c08@mira-sjcm-4.cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2002 12:50:16 +0100
Message-ID: <846.1025265016@cs.ucl.ac.uk>
From: Ken Carlberg <K.Carlberg@cs.ucl.ac.uk>
Sender: ieprep-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: ieprep-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: Internet Emergency Preparedness Working Group <ieprep.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ieprep@ietf.org

> This draft was discussed somewhat at the interim meeting, and on the 
> list.  Scott, Allison, and I have been thinking about the approach, and 
> Scott has a proposal for what he believes may be a better approach, 
> embedding the policy lookup in the RSVP exchange. I believe that we will 
> have a joint meeting with the SIP folks to sort this out.
>
>	draft-schulzrinne-ieprep-resource-req-00.txt

will the draft be presented at the joint meeting, or not at all?  
I noticed that there wasn't an IEPREP time slot set aside for the 
draft.  or is the draft sort of dead on arrival given Scott's new
proposal?

-ken




_______________________________________________
Ieprep mailing list
Ieprep@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ieprep