[IESG-AGENDA-DIST] IESG Telechat Agenda (Plain Text) for March 6, 2008
IESG Secretary <iesg-secretary-reply@ietf.org> Thu, 28 February 2008 23:13 UTC
Return-Path: <iesg-agenda-dist-bounces@iesg.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-iesg-agenda-dist-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-iesg-agenda-dist-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDA5128C5D7; Thu, 28 Feb 2008 15:13:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.500, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PvVMq70-HsbL; Thu, 28 Feb 2008 15:13:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E5D428C4FB; Thu, 28 Feb 2008 15:12:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: iesg-agenda-dist@ietf.org
Delivered-To: tmdaiesgagen@core3.amsl.com
Received: by core3.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 30) id 9115928C321; Thu, 28 Feb 2008 15:12:47 -0800 (PST)
Mime-Version: 1.0
To: iesg-agenda-dist@ietf.org
From: IESG Secretary <iesg-secretary-reply@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <20080228231247.9115928C321@core3.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 15:12:47 -0800
Subject: [IESG-AGENDA-DIST] IESG Telechat Agenda (Plain Text) for March 6, 2008
X-BeenThere: iesg-agenda-dist@iesg.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Distribution of IESG agendas <iesg-agenda-dist.iesg.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.iesg.org/mailman/listinfo/iesg-agenda-dist>, <mailto:iesg-agenda-dist-request@iesg.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.iesg.org/pipermail/iesg-agenda-dist>
List-Post: <mailto:iesg-agenda-dist@iesg.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iesg-agenda-dist-request@iesg.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.iesg.org/mailman/listinfo/iesg-agenda-dist>, <mailto:iesg-agenda-dist-request@iesg.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: iesg-agenda-dist-bounces@iesg.org
Errors-To: iesg-agenda-dist-bounces@iesg.org
INTERNET ENGINEERING STEERING GROUP (IESG) Summarized Agenda for the March 6, 2008 IESG Teleconference This agenda was generated at 15:12:47 EDT, February 28, 2008 Web version of this agenda can be found at: http://www.ietf.org/IESG/agenda.html 1. Administrivia 1.1 Roll Call 1.2 Bash the Agenda 1.3 Approval of the Minutes 1.4 Review of Action Items 2. Protocol Actions Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?" 2.1 WG Submissions 2.1.1 New Item o draft-ietf-imapext-i18n-15.txt Internet Message Access Protocol Internationalization (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 7 Token: Lisa Dusseault o draft-ietf-sipping-consent-format-06.txt A Document Format for Requesting Consent (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 7 Token: Jon Peterson o draft-ietf-sipping-pending-additions-04.txt The Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Pending Additions Event Package (Proposed Standard) - 3 of 7 Token: Jon Peterson o draft-ietf-sipping-service-examples-14.txt Session Initiation Protocol Service Examples (BCP) - 4 of 7 Token: Jon Peterson o draft-ietf-ecrit-lost-07.txt LoST: A Location-to-Service Translation Protocol (Proposed Standard) - 5 of 7 Token: Jon Peterson o draft-ietf-netconf-notification-12.txt NETCONF Event Notifications (Proposed Standard) - 6 of 7 Token: Dan Romascanu o draft-ietf-tls-rfc4346-bis-09.txt The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.2 (Proposed Standard) - 7 of 7 Token: Tim Polk 2.1.2 Returning Item o draft-ietf-msec-ipsec-extensions-08.txt Multicast Extensions to the Security Architecture for the Internet Protocol (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 2 Note: Lakshminath Dondeti is the proto shepherd. Token: Tim Polk o draft-ietf-netlmm-proxymip6-11.txt Proxy Mobile IPv6 (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 2 Note: Document Shepherd is Jonne Soininen Token: Jari Arkko 2.2 Individual Submissions 2.2.1 New Item o draft-harrington-text-mib-doc-template-04.txt A Template for Documents Containing a MIB Module (BCP) - 1 of 2 Token: Dan Romascanu o Two-document ballot: - 2 of 2 - draft-moriarty-post-inch-rid-soap-05.txt IODEF/RID over SOAP (Proposed Standard) - draft-moriarty-post-inch-rid-05.txt Real-time Inter-network Defense (Proposed Standard) Token: Tim Polk 2.2.2 Returning Item NONE 3. Document Actions 3.1 WG Submissions Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?" 3.1.1 New Item o draft-ietf-msec-mikey-applicability-08.txt On the applicability of various MIKEY modes and extensions (Informational) - 1 of 2 Note: Document Shepherd is Lakshminath Dondeti, ldondeti@qualcomm.com Token: Tim Polk o draft-ietf-mediactrl-requirements-04.txt Media Server Control Protocol Requirements (Informational) - 2 of 2 Token: Jon Peterson 3.1.2 Returning Item NONE 3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?" 3.2.1 New Item o draft-levin-mmusic-xml-media-control-13.txt XML Schema for Media Control (Informational) - 1 of 1 Token: Cullen Jennings 3.2.2 Returning Item NONE 3.3 Independent Submissions Via RFC Editor The IESG will use RFC 3932 responses: 1) The IESG has not found any conflict between this document and IETF work; 2) The IESG thinks that this work is related to IETF work done in WG <X>, but this does not prevent publishing; 3) The IESG thinks that publication is harmful to work in WG <X> and recommends not publishing at this time; 4) The IESG thinks that this document violates the IETF procedures for <X> and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval; 5) The IESG thinks that this document extends an IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval. The document shepherd must propose one of these responses in the Data Tracker note and supply complete text in the IESG Note portion of the write-up. The Area Director ballot positions indicate consensus with the response proposed by the document shepherd. Other matters may be recorded in comments, and the comments will be passed on to the RFC Editor as community review of the document. 3.3.1 New Item NONE 3.3.2 Returning Item NONE 4. Working Group Actions 4.1 WG Creation 4.1.1 Proposed for IETF Review NONE 4.1.2 Proposed for Approval o Timing over IP Connection and Transfer of Clock (tictoc) - 1 of 2 Token: Mark o Internationalized Domain Name (idn) - 2 of 2 Token: Lisa 4.2 WG Rechartering 4.2.1 Under evaluation for IETF Review o Multiparty Multimedia Session Control (mmusic) - 1 of 1 Token: Cullen 4.2.2 Proposed for Approval NONE 5. IAB News We can use 6. Management Issue 6.1 RFC Errata (Russ Housley) 6.2 Accelerate processing for draft-brenner-dime-peem-01 (Dan Romascanu) 7. Agenda Working Group News _______________________________________________ IESG-AGENDA-DIST mailing list IESG-AGENDA-DIST@iesg.org http://www.iesg.org/mailman/listinfo/iesg-agenda-dist
- [IESG-AGENDA-DIST] IESG Telechat Agenda (Plain Te… IESG Secretary
- [IESG-AGENDA-DIST] IESG Telechat Agenda (Plain Te… IESG Secretary
- [IESG-AGENDA-DIST] IESG Telechat Agenda (Plain Te… IESG Secretary