[IESG-AGENDA-DIST] IESG Telechat Agenda (Plain Text) for March 27, 2008
IESG Secretary <iesg-secretary-reply@ietf.org> Thu, 20 March 2008 21:25 UTC
Return-Path: <iesg-agenda-dist-bounces@iesg.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-iesg-agenda-dist-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-iesg-agenda-dist-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1180428C7A9; Thu, 20 Mar 2008 14:25:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yAoMrJpX0jub; Thu, 20 Mar 2008 14:25:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66B9D28C777; Thu, 20 Mar 2008 14:25:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: iesg-agenda-dist@ietf.org
Delivered-To: tmdaiesgagen@core3.amsl.com
Received: by core3.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 30) id A9CEF28C72A; Thu, 20 Mar 2008 14:25:51 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0
To: iesg-agenda-dist@ietf.org
From: IESG Secretary <iesg-secretary-reply@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <20080320212551.A9CEF28C72A@core3.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 14:25:51 -0700
Subject: [IESG-AGENDA-DIST] IESG Telechat Agenda (Plain Text) for March 27, 2008
X-BeenThere: iesg-agenda-dist@iesg.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Distribution of IESG agendas <iesg-agenda-dist.iesg.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.iesg.org/mailman/listinfo/iesg-agenda-dist>, <mailto:iesg-agenda-dist-request@iesg.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.iesg.org/pipermail/iesg-agenda-dist>
List-Post: <mailto:iesg-agenda-dist@iesg.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iesg-agenda-dist-request@iesg.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.iesg.org/mailman/listinfo/iesg-agenda-dist>, <mailto:iesg-agenda-dist-request@iesg.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: iesg-agenda-dist-bounces@iesg.org
Errors-To: iesg-agenda-dist-bounces@iesg.org
INTERNET ENGINEERING STEERING GROUP (IESG) Summarized Agenda for the March 27, 2008 IESG Teleconference This agenda was generated at 14:25:51 EDT, March 20, 2008 Web version of this agenda can be found at: http://www.ietf.org/IESG/agenda.html 1. Administrivia 1.1 Roll Call 1.2 Bash the Agenda 1.3 Approval of the Minutes 1.4 Review of Action Items 2. Protocol Actions Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?" 2.1 WG Submissions 2.1.1 New Item o draft-ietf-mipshop-fmipv6-rfc4068bis-06.txt Mobile IPv6 Fast Handovers (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 3 Note: Document Shepherd is Vijay Devarapalli Token: Jari Arkko o draft-ietf-netconf-notification-12.txt NETCONF Event Notifications (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 3 Token: Dan Romascanu o draft-ietf-rohc-rfc3095bis-rohcv2-profiles-06.txt RObust Header Compression Version 2 (ROHCv2): Profiles for RTP, UDP, IP, ESP and UDP Lite (Proposed Standard) - 3 of 3 Token: Magnus Westerlund 2.1.2 Returning Item o draft-ietf-imapext-sort-20.txt INTERNET MESSAGE ACCESS PROTOCOL - SORT AND THREAD EXTENSIONS (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 4 Token: Lisa Dusseault o draft-ietf-nsis-ntlp-15.txt GIST: General Internet Signalling Transport (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 4 Note: WG Shepherd: John Loughney (john.loughney@nokia.com). Abstainers please re-review your motivations in regards to the updated version. Token: Magnus Westerlund o draft-ietf-mip6-hiopt-11.txt DHCP Options for Home Information Discovery in MIPv6 (Proposed Standard) - 3 of 4 Note: Document Shepherd is Basavaraj Patil Token: Jari Arkko o draft-ietf-netlmm-proxymip6-11.txt Proxy Mobile IPv6 (Proposed Standard) - 4 of 4 Note: Document Shepherd is Jonne Soininen Token: Jari Arkko 2.2 Individual Submissions 2.2.1 New Item NONE 2.2.2 Returning Item o draft-narten-iana-considerations-rfc2434bis-08.txt Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs (BCP) - 1 of 1 Token: Russ Housley 3. Document Actions 3.1 WG Submissions Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?" 3.1.1 New Item o draft-ietf-mipshop-3gfh-05.txt Mobile IPv6 Fast Handovers for 3G CDMA Networks (Informational) - 1 of 4 Note: Document Shepherd is Vijay Devarapalli Token: Jari Arkko o draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-mln-eval-05.txt Evaluation of existing GMPLS Protocols against Multi Layer and Multi Region Networks (MLN/MRN) (Informational) - 2 of 4 Token: Ross Callon o draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-mln-reqs-08.txt Requirements for GMPLS-Based Multi-Region and Multi-Layer Networks (MRN/MLN) (Informational) - 3 of 4 Token: Ross Callon o draft-ietf-l1vpn-applicability-basic-mode-04.txt Applicability Statement for Layer 1 Virtual Private Networks (L1VPNs) Basic Mode (Informational) - 4 of 4 Token: David Ward 3.1.2 Returning Item NONE 3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?" 3.2.1 New Item NONE 3.2.2 Returning Item NONE 3.3 Independent Submissions Via RFC Editor The IESG will use RFC 3932 responses: 1) The IESG has not found any conflict between this document and IETF work; 2) The IESG thinks that this work is related to IETF work done in WG <X>, but this does not prevent publishing; 3) The IESG thinks that publication is harmful to work in WG <X> and recommends not publishing at this time; 4) The IESG thinks that this document violates the IETF procedures for <X> and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval; 5) The IESG thinks that this document extends an IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval. The document shepherd must propose one of these responses in the Data Tracker note and supply complete text in the IESG Note portion of the write-up. The Area Director ballot positions indicate consensus with the response proposed by the document shepherd. Other matters may be recorded in comments, and the comments will be passed on to the RFC Editor as community review of the document. 3.3.1 New Item NONE 3.3.2 Returning Item NONE 4. Working Group Actions 4.1 WG Creation 4.1.1 Proposed for IETF Review NONE 4.1.2 Proposed for Approval o Internationalized Domain Name (idn) - 1 of 1 Token: Lisa 4.2 WG Rechartering 4.2.1 Under evaluation for IETF Review o Multiparty Multimedia Session Control (mmusic) - 1 of 1 Token: Cullen 4.2.2 Proposed for Approval NONE 5. IAB News We can use 6. Management Issue 6.1 Updating media registration for audio/3gpp and video/3gpp (Magnus Westerlund) 7. Agenda Working Group News _______________________________________________ IESG-AGENDA-DIST mailing list IESG-AGENDA-DIST@iesg.org http://www.iesg.org/mailman/listinfo/iesg-agenda-dist
- [IESG-AGENDA-DIST] IESG Telechat Agenda (Plain Te… IESG Secretary