[IESG-AGENDA-DIST] IESG Telechat Agenda (HTML) for December 3, 2009

IESG Secretary <iesg-secretary-reply@ietf.org> Fri, 27 November 2009 23:03 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@core3.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: iesg-agenda-dist@ietf.org
Delivered-To: iesg-agenda-dist@core3.amsl.com
Received: by core3.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 30) id D4C273A67C0; Fri, 27 Nov 2009 15:03:12 -0800 (PST)
From: IESG Secretary <iesg-secretary-reply@ietf.org>
To: iesg-agenda-dist@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <20091127230312.D4C273A67C0@core3.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 15:03:12 -0800
Subject: [IESG-AGENDA-DIST] IESG Telechat Agenda (HTML) for December 3, 2009
X-BeenThere: iesg-agenda-dist@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Distribution of IESG agendas <iesg-agenda-dist.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iesg-agenda-dist>, <mailto:iesg-agenda-dist-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/iesg-agenda-dist>
List-Post: <mailto:iesg-agenda-dist@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iesg-agenda-dist-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iesg-agenda-dist>, <mailto:iesg-agenda-dist-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 23:03:13 -0000

IESG Agenda

IESG Agenda

Good approximation of what will be included in the Agenda of next Telechat (2009-12-03).


1. Administrivia

    1.1 Roll Call
    1.2 Bash the Agenda
    1.3 Approval of the Minutes of the past telechat
    1.4 List of Remaining Action Items from Last Telechat

2. Protocol Actions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet
infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"
         

2.1 WG Submissions

          2.1.1 New Item
      AreaDate
SECUsing GSS-API Mechanisms in SASL: The GS2 Mechanism Family (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 8
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sasl-gs2-18.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-ietf-sasl-gs2-18.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=2573&filename=draft-ietf-sasl-gs2" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot]
Note: Alexey Melnikov (alexey.melnikov@isode.com) is the document shepherd
Token: Pasi Eronen
OPSDefinitions of Managed Objects for IP Flow Information Export (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 8
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ipfix-mib-08.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-ietf-ipfix-mib-08.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=2989&filename=draft-ietf-ipfix-mib" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot]
Token: Dan Romascanu
TSVSupport for RSVP in Layer 3 VPNs (Proposed Standard) - 3 of 8
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-tsvwg-rsvp-l3vpn-05.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-ietf-tsvwg-rsvp-l3vpn-05.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=3011&filename=draft-ietf-tsvwg-rsvp-l3vpn" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot]
Token: Magnus Westerlund
RTGAuthentication and Confidentiality in PIM-SM Link-local Messages (Proposed Standard) - 4 of 8
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-pim-sm-linklocal-09.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-ietf-pim-sm-linklocal-09.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=3095&filename=draft-ietf-pim-sm-linklocal" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot]
Note: Document shepherd is Stig Venaas <stig@venaas.com>
Token: Adrian Farrel
RTGSupport of address families in OSPFv3 (Proposed Standard) - 5 of 8
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ospf-af-alt-09.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-ietf-ospf-af-alt-09.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=3174&filename=draft-ietf-ospf-af-alt" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot]
Token: Ross Callon
RTGAdvertising a Router's Local Addresses in OSPF TE Extensions (Proposed Standard) - 6 of 8
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ospf-te-node-addr-06.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-ietf-ospf-te-node-addr-06.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=3185&filename=draft-ietf-ospf-te-node-addr" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot]
Note: Acee Lindem (acee@redback.com) is the document shepherd.
Token: Ross Callon
RTGLabel Switched Path (LSP) Dynamic Provisioning Performance Metrics in Generalized MPLS Networks (Proposed Standard) - 7 of 8
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ccamp-lsp-dppm-10.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-ietf-ccamp-lsp-dppm-10.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=3240&filename=draft-ietf-ccamp-lsp-dppm" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot]
Note: Lou Berger (lberger@labn.net) is the document shepherd.
Token: Adrian Farrel
INTTransmission of IPv4 packets over IEEE 802.16's IP Convergence Sublayer (Proposed Standard) - 8 of 8
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-16ng-ipv4-over-802-dot-16-ipcs-06.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-ietf-16ng-ipv4-over-802-dot-16-ipcs-06.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=3242&filename=draft-ietf-16ng-ipv4-over-802-dot-16-ipcs" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot]
Note: Gabriel Montenegro (g_e_montenegro@yahoo.com) is the document shepherd.
Token: Ralph Droms
2.1.2 Returning Item
      NONE

2.2 Individual Submissions

          2.2.1 New Item
      AreaDate
APPPATCH Method for HTTP (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 4
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-dusseault-http-patch-16.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-dusseault-http-patch-16.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=3079&filename=draft-dusseault-http-patch" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot]
Note: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> agreed to be the document shepherd.
Token: Alexey Melnikov
APPFTP Extension Registry (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 4
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-klensin-ftp-registry-02.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-klensin-ftp-registry-02.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=3200&filename=draft-klensin-ftp-registry" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot]
Note: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> is the document shepherd.
Token: Alexey Melnikov
APPDefining Well-Known URIs (Proposed Standard) - 3 of 4
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-nottingham-site-meta-04.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-nottingham-site-meta-04.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=3236&filename=draft-nottingham-site-meta" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot]
Token: Lisa Dusseault
APPIMAP4 Keyword Registry (Proposed Standard) - 4 of 4
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-melnikov-imap-keywords-07.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-melnikov-imap-keywords-07.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=3246&filename=draft-melnikov-imap-keywords" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot]
Note: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> is the document shepherd.
Token: Lisa Dusseault
2.2.2 Returning Item
      NONE

3. Document Actions

         

3.1 WG Submissions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable
contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If
not, what changes would make it so?"
          3.1.1 New Item
      AreaDate
INTBasic Socket Interface Extensions for Host Identity Protocol (HIP) (Experimental) - 1 of 1
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-hip-native-api-09.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-ietf-hip-native-api-09.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=3250&filename=draft-ietf-hip-native-api" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot]
Note: Gonzalo Camarillo (Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com) is the document shepherd.
Token: Ralph Droms
3.1.2 Returning Item
      AreaDate
INTSecuring Neighbor Discovery Proxy Problem Statement (Informational) - 1 of 1
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-csi-sndp-prob-03.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-ietf-csi-sndp-prob-03.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=3247&filename=draft-ietf-csi-sndp-prob" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot]
Note: The document shepherd is Marcelo Bagnulo (marcelo@it.uc3m.es)
Token: Ralph Droms

3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable
contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If
not, what changes would make it so?"
          3.2.1 New Item
      AreaDate
INTMar 15The SatLabs Group DVB-RCS MIB (Informational) - 1 of 3
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-combes-ipdvb-mib-rcs-08.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-combes-ipdvb-mib-rcs-08.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=2896&filename=draft-combes-ipdvb-mib-rcs" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot]
Note: Document Shepherd is Gorry Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Token: Jari Arkko
APPRFC 2731 ("Encoding Dublin Core Metadata in HTML") is Obsolete (Informational) - 2 of 3
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-reschke-rfc2731bis-04.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-reschke-rfc2731bis-04.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=3198&filename=draft-reschke-rfc2731bis" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot]
Note: Bernard Desruisseaux <bernard.desruisseaux@oracle.com> is the document shepherd.
RFC Editor seems to be fine with the idea of obsoleting an RFC submitted directly to RFC Editor (e.g. RFC 2731) with an AD sponsored document.
Token: Alexey Melnikov
APPThe OAuth Core 1.0 Protocol (Informational) - 3 of 3
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-hammer-oauth-07.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-hammer-oauth-07.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=3235&filename=draft-hammer-oauth" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot]
Token: Lisa Dusseault
3.2.2 Returning Item
      NONE

3.3 Independent Submissions Via RFC Editor

The IESG will use RFC 3932 responses: 1) The IESG has not
found any conflict between this document and IETF work; 2) The
IESG thinks that this work is related to IETF work done in WG
<X>, but this does not prevent publishing; 3) The IESG thinks
that publication is harmful to work in WG <X> and recommends
not publishing at this time; 4) The IESG thinks that this
document violates the IETF procedures for <X> and should
therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG
approval; 5) The IESG thinks that this document extends an
IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should
therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval.

The document shepherd must propose one of these responses in
the Data Tracker note and supply complete text in the IESG
Note portion of the write-up. The Area Director ballot positions
indicate consensus with the response proposed by the
document shepherd.

Other matters may be recorded in comments, and the comments will
be passed on to the RFC Editor as community review of the document.
          3.3.1 New Item
      NONE
3.3.2 Returning Item
      AreaDate
INT4over6 Transit Solution using IP Encapsulation and MP-BGP Extensions (Experimental) - 1 of 1
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-wu-softwire-4over6-03.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-wu-softwire-4over6-03.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=3249&filename=draft-wu-softwire-4over6" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot]
Token: Ralph Droms

4. Working Group Actions

         

4.1 WG Creation

          4.1.1 Proposed for IETF Review
                    NONE
          4.1.2 Proposed for Approval
         
AreaDate
APPNov 19HTTP State Management Mechanism (httpstate) - 1 of 1
Token:Lisa
         

4.2 WG Rechartering

          4.2.1 Under evaluation for IETF Review
                    NONE
          4.2.2 Proposed for Approval
                    NONE

5. IAB News We Can Use

6. Management Issues

6.1 RIM IPR disclosure and application/3gpp-ims+xml media type registration (Alexey Melnikov)

7. Working Group News