[IESG-AGENDA-DIST] IESG Telechat Agenda (HTML) for June 4, 2009

[IESG Secretary <[e-mail]>]

IESG Agenda

IESG Agenda

Good approximation of what will be included in the Agenda of next Telechat (2009-06-04).

---

1. Administrivia

1.1 Roll Call
1.2 Bash the Agenda
1.3 Approval of the Minutes of the past telechat
1.4 List of Remaining Action Items from Last Telechat

2. Protocol Actions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet
infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"

2.1 WG Submissions           2.1.1 New Item       Area Date SEC DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Author Domain Signing Practices (ADSP) (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 7 http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-10.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-10.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=2735&filename=draft-ietf-dkim-ssp" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot] Note: Document shepherd is Stephen Farrell ([e-mail]) Token: Pasi Eronen RAI Managing Client Initiated Connections in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 7 http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sip-outbound-18.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-ietf-sip-outbound-18.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=2860&filename=draft-ietf-sip-outbound" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot] Token: Robert Sparks RAI SDP Capability Negotiation (Proposed Standard) - 3 of 7 http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-capability-negotiation-10.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-capability-negotiation-10.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=2893&filename=draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-capability-negotiation" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot] Note: Proto Shepherd: Jean-Francois Mule ([e-mail]) Token: Cullen Jennings INT IPv4 Support for Proxy Mobile IPv6 (Proposed Standard) - 4 of 7 http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-netlmm-pmip6-ipv4-support-12.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-ietf-netlmm-pmip6-ipv4-support-12.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=3004&filename=draft-ietf-netlmm-pmip6-ipv4-support" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot] Token: Jari Arkko TSV More Features for the Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol - TWAMP (Proposed Standard) - 5 of 7 http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ippm-more-twamp-02.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-ietf-ippm-more-twamp-02.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=3083&filename=draft-ietf-ippm-more-twamp" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot] Token: Lars Eggert SEC RFC 4871 DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures -- Update (Proposed Standard) - 6 of 7 http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata-05.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata-05.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=3084&filename=draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot] Token: Pasi Eronen INT DNS Proxy Implementation Guidelines (BCP) - 7 of 7 http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-dnsext-dnsproxy-05.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-ietf-dnsext-dnsproxy-05.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=3086&filename=draft-ietf-dnsext-dnsproxy" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot] Token: Ralph Droms 2.1.2 Returning Item       NONE 2.2 Individual Submissions           2.2.1 New Item       Area Date APP Internet Mail Architecture (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 1 http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-crocker-email-arch-13.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-crocker-email-arch-13.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=2543&filename=draft-crocker-email-arch" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot] Note: Tony Hansen is document shepherd. Token: Alexey Melnikov 2.2.2 Returning Item       NONE

3. Document Actions

3.1 WG Submissions Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?"           3.1.1 New Item       Area Date RAI The SEED Cipher Algorithm and Its Use with the Secure Real-time Transport Protocol (SRTP (Informational) - 1 of 2 http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-avt-seed-srtp-11.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-ietf-avt-seed-srtp-11.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=3025&filename=draft-ietf-avt-seed-srtp" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot] Token: Cullen Jennings RAI Implications of 'retransmission-allowed' for SIP Location Conveyance (Informational) - 2 of 2 http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-geopriv-sip-lo-retransmission-02.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-ietf-geopriv-sip-lo-retransmission-02.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=3082&filename=draft-ietf-geopriv-sip-lo-retransmission" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot] Token: Cullen Jennings 3.1.2 Returning Item       NONE 3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?"           3.2.1 New Item       Area Date RAI UA-Driven Privacy Mechanism for SIP (Informational) - 1 of 1 http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sip-ua-privacy-08.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-ietf-sip-ua-privacy-08.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=3072&filename=draft-ietf-sip-ua-privacy" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot] Token: Cullen Jennings 3.2.2 Returning Item       NONE 3.3 Independent Submissions Via RFC Editor The IESG will use RFC 3932 responses: 1) The IESG has not found any conflict between this document and IETF work; 2) The IESG thinks that this work is related to IETF work done in WG <X>, but this does not prevent publishing; 3) The IESG thinks that publication is harmful to work in WG <X> and recommends not publishing at this time; 4) The IESG thinks that this document violates the IETF procedures for <X> and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval; 5) The IESG thinks that this document extends an IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval. The document shepherd must propose one of these responses in the Data Tracker note and supply complete text in the IESG Note portion of the write-up. The Area Director ballot positions indicate consensus with the response proposed by the document shepherd. Other matters may be recorded in comments, and the comments will be passed on to the RFC Editor as community review of the document.           3.3.1 New Item       Area Date GEN Unintended Consequence of two NAT deployments with Overlapping Address Space (Informational) - 1 of 1 http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ford-behave-top-06.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-ford-behave-top-06.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=3098&filename=draft-ford-behave-top" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot] Token: Magnus Westerlund 3.3.2 Returning Item       NONE

4. Working Group Actions

4.1 WG Creation           4.1.1 Proposed for IETF Review                     NONE           4.1.2 Proposed for Approval                     NONE

4.2 WG Rechartering           4.2.1 Under evaluation for IETF Review           Area Date TSV May 27 Behavior Engineering for Hindrance Avoidance (behave) - 1 of 1 Token: Magnus           4.2.2 Proposed for Approval                     NONE

5. IAB News We Can Use

6. Management Issues

6.1 RFC 4543 IANA allocations for IKEv1 (Pasi Eronen)
6.2 IESG Requirements to NomCom (Russ Housley)
6.3 Review of application/mp21 Media Type (Alexey Melnikov)
6.4 Review of application/3gpp-ims+xml Media Type (Alexey Melnikov)

7. Working Group News