[IESG-AGENDA-DIST] IESG Telechat Agenda (HTML) for January 10, 2008

[IESG Secretary <[e-mail]>]

IESG Agenda

IESG Agenda

Good approximation of what will be included in the Agenda of next Telechat (2008-01-10).

---

1. Administrivia

1.1 Roll Call
1.2 Bash the Agenda
1.3 Approval of the Minutes of the past telechat
1.4 List of Remaining Action Items from Last Telechat

2. Protocol Actions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet
infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"

2.1 WG Submissions           2.1.1 New Item       Area Date OPS Sampling and Filtering Techniques for IP Packet Selection (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 10 http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-psamp-sample-tech-10.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-ietf-psamp-sample-tech-10.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=1780&filename=draft-ietf-psamp-sample-tech" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot] Token: Dan Romascanu RAI A Telephone Number Mapping (ENUM) Service Registration for Internet Calendaring Services (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 10 http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-enum-calendar-service-03.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-ietf-enum-calendar-service-03.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=2219&filename=draft-ietf-enum-calendar-service" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot] Token: Jon Peterson INT Failure Detection and Locator Pair Exploration Protocol for IPv6 Multihoming (Proposed Standard) - 3 of 10 http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-shim6-failure-detection-09.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-ietf-shim6-failure-detection-09.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=2285&filename=draft-ietf-shim6-failure-detection" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot] Note: Please also read draft-ietf-shim6-applicability Mark is handling this for Jari as he is an author Token: Mark Townsley INT Shim6: Level 3 Multihoming Shim Protocol for IPv6 (Proposed Standard) - 4 of 10 http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-shim6-proto-09.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-ietf-shim6-proto-09.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=2286&filename=draft-ietf-shim6-proto" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot] Note: Please also read draft-ietf-shim6-applicability Document Shepherd is Geoff Huston <[e-mail]> Token: Jari Arkko APP Sieve Email Filtering: Body Extension (Proposed Standard) - 5 of 10 http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sieve-body-07.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-ietf-sieve-body-07.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=2509&filename=draft-ietf-sieve-body" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot] Token: Lisa Dusseault SEC Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate and Certificate Revocation List (CRL) Profile (Proposed Standard) - 6 of 10 http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-pkix-rfc3280bis-10.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-ietf-pkix-rfc3280bis-10.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=2545&filename=draft-ietf-pkix-rfc3280bis" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot] Token: Sam Hartman OPS Packet Sampling (PSAMP) Protocol Specifications (Proposed Standard) - 7 of 10 http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-psamp-protocol-09.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-ietf-psamp-protocol-09.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=2556&filename=draft-ietf-psamp-protocol" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot] Token: Dan Romascanu SEC The EAP TLS Authentication Protocol (Proposed Standard) - 8 of 10 http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-simon-emu-rfc2716bis-12.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-simon-emu-rfc2716bis-12.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=2580&filename=draft-simon-emu-rfc2716bis" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot] Note: Joe Salowey  is the proto shepherd Token: Sam Hartman SEC Multicast Extensions to the Security Architecture for the Internet Protocol (Proposed Standard) - 9 of 10 http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-msec-ipsec-extensions-07.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-ietf-msec-ipsec-extensions-07.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=2654&filename=draft-ietf-msec-ipsec-extensions" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot] Note: Lakshminath Dondeti is the proto shepherd. Token: Tim Polk RAI A Framework for Consent-based Communications in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) (Proposed Standard) - 10 of 10 http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sip-consent-framework-03.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-ietf-sip-consent-framework-03.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=2687&filename=draft-ietf-sip-consent-framework" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot] Note: Keith Drage is the document shepherd Token: Cullen Jennings 2.1.2 Returning Item       NONE 2.2 Individual Submissions           2.2.1 New Item       Area Date INT IANA Allocation Guidelines for the Protocol Field (BCP) - 1 of 1 http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-arkko-rfc2780-proto-update-01.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-arkko-rfc2780-proto-update-01.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=2658&filename=draft-arkko-rfc2780-proto-update" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot] Token: Russ Housley 2.2.2 Returning Item       NONE

3. Document Actions

3.1 WG Submissions Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?"           3.1.1 New Item       Area Date SEC Problem and Applicability Statement for Better Than Nothing Security (BTNS) (Informational) - 1 of 3 http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-btns-prob-and-applic-06.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-ietf-btns-prob-and-applic-06.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=2475&filename=draft-ietf-btns-prob-and-applic" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot] Token: Sam Hartman OPS IPv6 Deployment Scenarios in 802.16 Networks (Informational) - 2 of 3 http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-v6ops-802-16-deployment-scenarios-06.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-ietf-v6ops-802-16-deployment-scenarios-06.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=2551&filename=draft-ietf-v6ops-802-16-deployment-scenarios" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot] Token: Ron Bonica SEC Network Endpoint Assessment (NEA): Overview and Requirements (Informational) - 3 of 3 http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-nea-requirements-05.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-ietf-nea-requirements-05.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=2684&filename=draft-ietf-nea-requirements" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot] Token: Tim Polk 3.1.2 Returning Item       NONE 3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?"           3.2.1 New Item       NONE 3.2.2 Returning Item       Area Date GEN A Uniform Resource Name (URN) Namespace for the Digital Video Broadcasting Project (DVB) (Informational) - 1 of 1 http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-adolf-dvb-urn-03.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-adolf-dvb-urn-03.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=2583&filename=draft-adolf-dvb-urn" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot] Token: Lisa Dusseault 3.3 Independent Submissions Via RFC Editor The IESG will use RFC 3932 responses: 1) The IESG has not found any conflict between this document and IETF work; 2) The IESG thinks that this work is related to IETF work done in WG <X>, but this does not prevent publishing; 3) The IESG thinks that publication is harmful to work in WG <X> and recommends not publishing at this time; 4) The IESG thinks that this document violates the IETF procedures for <X> and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval; 5) The IESG thinks that this document extends an IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval. The document shepherd must propose one of these responses in the Data Tracker note and supply complete text in the IESG Note portion of the write-up. The Area Director ballot positions indicate consensus with the response proposed by the document shepherd. Other matters may be recorded in comments, and the comments will be passed on to the RFC Editor as community review of the document.           3.3.1 New Item       NONE 3.3.2 Returning Item       NONE

4. Working Group Actions

4.1 WG Creation           4.1.1 Proposed for IETF Review           Area Date APP Dec 26 vCard and CardDAV (vcarddav) - 1 of 3 Token: Chris RTG Dec 20 Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks (roll) - 2 of 3 Token: David INT Dec 28 Cga & Send maIntenance (csi) - 3 of 3 Token: Jari           4.1.2 Proposed for Approval                     NONE

4.2 WG Rechartering           4.2.1 Under evaluation for IETF Review                     NONE           4.2.2 Proposed for Approval                     NONE

5. IAB News We Can Use

6. Management Issues

6.1 Approval of the IESG Policy on Autoresponse Messages Sent to IETF Mailing Lists (Chris Newman)

7. Working Group News

_______________________________________________
IESG-AGENDA-DIST mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iesg-agenda-dist