[IESG-AGENDA-DIST] IESG Telechat Agenda (Plain Text) for January 29, 2009

IESG Secretary <iesg-secretary-reply@ietf.org> Thu, 22 January 2009 22:40 UTC

Return-Path: <iesg-agenda-dist-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: iesg-agenda-dist-archive@optimus.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-iesg-agenda-dist-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2335028C17F; Thu, 22 Jan 2009 14:40:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: iesg-agenda-dist@ietf.org
Delivered-To: iesg-agenda-dist@core3.amsl.com
Received: by core3.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 30) id 750973A6828; Thu, 22 Jan 2009 14:40:24 -0800 (PST)
From: IESG Secretary <iesg-secretary-reply@ietf.org>
To: iesg-agenda-dist@ietf.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <20090122224024.750973A6828@core3.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 14:40:24 -0800
Subject: [IESG-AGENDA-DIST] IESG Telechat Agenda (Plain Text) for January 29, 2009
X-BeenThere: iesg-agenda-dist@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Distribution of IESG agendas <iesg-agenda-dist.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iesg-agenda-dist>, <mailto:iesg-agenda-dist-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/iesg-agenda-dist>
List-Post: <mailto:iesg-agenda-dist@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iesg-agenda-dist-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iesg-agenda-dist>, <mailto:iesg-agenda-dist-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: iesg-agenda-dist-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: iesg-agenda-dist-bounces@ietf.org INTERNET ENGINEERING STEERING GROUP (IESG)

Summarized Agenda for the January 29, 2009 IESG Teleconference

This agenda was generated at 14:40:24 EDT, January 22, 2009
Web version of this agenda can be found at:
http://www.ietf.org/IESG/agenda.html
                                                                                
1. Administrivia
                                                                                
  1.1 Roll Call
  1.2 Bash the Agenda
  1.3 Approval of the Minutes
  1.4 Review of Action Items

2. Protocol Actions
	Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
	reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet
	infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"


2.1 WG Submissions
2.1.1 New Item
  o draft-ietf-mext-nemo-mib-04.txt
    NEMO Management Information Base (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 10 
    Token: Jari Arkko
  o draft-ietf-radext-management-authorization-06.txt
    Remote Authentication Dial-In User Service (RADIUS) Authorization for 
    Network Access Server (NAS) Management (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 10 
    Token: Dan Romascanu
  o draft-ietf-pkix-rfc4055-update-01.txt
    Update for RSAES-OAEP Algorithm Parameters (Proposed Standard) - 3 of 10 
    Token: Pasi Eronen
  o draft-ietf-softwire-mesh-framework-05.txt
    Softwire Mesh Framework (Proposed Standard) - 4 of 10 
    Token: Mark Townsley
  o draft-ietf-softwire-encaps-safi-04.txt
    BGP Encapsulation SAFI and BGP Tunnel Encapsulation Attribute (Proposed 
    Standard) - 5 of 10 
    Token: Mark Townsley
  o draft-ietf-softwire-encaps-ipsec-01.txt
    BGP IPSec Tunnel Encapsulation Attribute (Proposed Standard) - 6 of 10 
    Token: Mark Townsley
  o draft-ietf-softwire-bgp-te-attribute-04.txt
    BGP Traffic Engineering Attribute (Proposed Standard) - 7 of 10 
    Token: Mark Townsley
  o draft-ietf-softwire-v4nlri-v6nh-01.txt
    Advertising an IPv4 NLRI with an IPv6 Next Hop (Proposed Standard) - 8 of 
    10 
    Token: Mark Townsley
  o draft-ietf-tls-psk-new-mac-aes-gcm-05.txt
    Pre-Shared Key Cipher Suites for Transport Layer Security (TLS) with 
    SHA-256/384 and AES Galois Counter Mode (Proposed Standard) - 9 of 10 
    Note: Document Shepherd is jsalowey@cisco.com 
    Token: Pasi Eronen
  o draft-ietf-idr-flow-spec-03.txt
    Dissemination of flow specification rules (Proposed Standard) - 10 of 10 
    Token: David Ward

2.1.2 Returning Item
  o draft-ietf-mipshop-mstp-solution-11.txt
    IEEE 802.21 Mobility Services Framework Design (MSFD) (Proposed Standard) - 
    1 of 1 
    Token: Jari Arkko


2.2 Individual Submissions
2.2.1 New Item
  o draft-stjohns-sipso-06.txt
    Common Architecture Label IPv6 Security Option (CALIPSO) (Proposed 
    Standard) - 1 of 3 
    Token: Tim Polk
  o draft-hoffman-dac-vbr-05.txt
    Vouch By Reference (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 3 
    Token: Russ Housley
  o draft-melnikov-sieve-imapext-metadata-08.txt
    The Sieve mail filtering language - extensions for checking mailbox status 
    and accessing mailbox metadata (Proposed Standard) - 3 of 3 
    Token: Lisa Dusseault

2.2.2 Returning Item
NONE

3. Document Actions

3.1 WG Submissions
	Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable
	contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If
	not, what changes would make it so?"

3.1.1 New Item
  o draft-ietf-trill-prob-05.txt
    Transparent Interconnection of Lots of Links (TRILL): Problem and 
    Applicability Statement (Informational) - 1 of 3 
    Token: Mark Townsley
  o draft-ietf-pim-rpf-vector-08.txt
    The RPF Vector TLV (Informational) - 2 of 3 
    Token: David Ward
  o draft-ietf-tls-ecdhe-psk-05.txt
    ECDHE_PSK Ciphersuites for Transport Layer Security (TLS) (Informational) - 
    3 of 3 
    Token: Pasi Eronen

3.1.2 Returning Item
NONE

3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD
	Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable
	contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If
	not, what changes would make it so?"

3.2.1 New Item
NONE
3.2.2 Returning Item
NONE
3.3 Independent Submissions Via RFC Editor
	The IESG will use RFC 3932 responses: 1) The IESG has not
	found any conflict between this document and IETF work; 2) The
	IESG thinks that this work is related to IETF work done in WG
	<X>, but this does not prevent publishing; 3) The IESG thinks
	that publication is harmful to work in WG <X> and recommends
	not publishing at this time; 4) The IESG thinks that this
	document violates the IETF procedures for <X> and should
	therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG
	approval; 5) The IESG thinks that this document extends an
	IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should
	therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval.

	The document shepherd must propose one of these responses in
	the Data Tracker note and supply complete text in the IESG
	Note portion of the write-up. The Area Director ballot positions
	indicate consensus with the response proposed by the
	document shepherd.

	Other matters may be recorded in comments, and the comments will
	be passed on to the RFC Editor as community review of the document.


3.3.1 New Item
NONE
3.3.2 Returning Item
NONE
3.3.3 For Action
  o draft-irtf-routing-history-09.txt
    Analysis of Inter-Domain Routing Requirements and History (Historic) - 1 of 
    2 
    Token: Russ Housley
  o draft-irtf-routing-reqs-10.txt
    A Set of Possible Requirements for a Future Routing Architecture (Historic) 
    - 2 of 2 
    Token: Russ Housley

4. Working Group Actions
4.1 WG Creation
4.1.1 Proposed for IETF Review
    NONE
4.1.2 Proposed for Approval
    NONE
4.2 WG Rechartering
4.2.1 Under evaluation for IETF Review
    NONE
4.2.2 Proposed for Approval
  o Network Configuration (netconf) - 1 of 2
    Token: Dan
  o IP Performance Metrics (ippm) - 2 of 2
    Token: Lars

5. IAB News We can use

6. Management Issue

 6.1 IESG Statement regarding chartered work overcome by events before IESG consideration (Ron Bonica)

7. Agenda Working Group News


_______________________________________________
IESG-AGENDA-DIST mailing list
IESG-AGENDA-DIST@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iesg-agenda-dist