Re: radical suggestion

[Tony Hansen <[e-mail]>]

How about issuing both the updated 2821/2822 AND a pair of amendments 
documents as I-Ds. That way, we have the advantage of being able to 
discuss each amendment individually, as well as seeing the resulting 
text that comes about from applying those amendments.

	Tony

Keith Moore wrote:
>>One can always limit the scope of the work to only considering specific
>>changes with the basic assumption that RFC 2822 will remain almost
>>entirely unchanged.
> 
> well, maybe the thing to do is to _discuss_ amendments rather than
> a revised document, with the understanding that the amendments won't
> be incorporated into the document until (just before) last call.
> 
> note that the amendments can still be useful in their own right, for
> people who are very familiar with the current spec - those people want
> to know the diffs from the previous version.
> 
> Keith
>