[ietf-822] Proposal to invoke a 7601bis effort

"Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com> Fri, 01 December 2017 20:39 UTC

Return-Path: <kurta@drkurt.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-822@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-822@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB95E128BB6 for <ietf-822@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Dec 2017 12:39:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=drkurt.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id G05xNPAa91zV for <ietf-822@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Dec 2017 12:39:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lf0-x229.google.com (mail-lf0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15EED127867 for <ietf-822@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Dec 2017 12:39:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lf0-x229.google.com with SMTP id e137so13081151lfg.5 for <ietf-822@ietf.org>; Fri, 01 Dec 2017 12:39:57 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=drkurt.com; s=20130612; h=mime-version:sender:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=S1uNzWedkD0rdKvL1fFh5SJxo+q4TIDv29rdD1uF1Fk=; b=XEw+xF9AvLcG0W3/7C6XntHwi8xWLviQO3PLdDF/EmPWq3l6cKlk6XP3Cwaqbl5ksf dQyQjqTTD+7vD4lCEFcAVIYv8ix6L8+j48d9JHrvK+ogxeIMGDqR7PK5zKxprXEfHn2/ xHj04Ve0g96t1acM8tNlGo+NiR65so0gK14C4=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:from:date:message-id:subject :to; bh=S1uNzWedkD0rdKvL1fFh5SJxo+q4TIDv29rdD1uF1Fk=; b=X19gdSXk8VBY/5VatgdOGG/HubF5XbkPBy0XF+yKe3dlacLtIJ8kLkdIXMAru+GBcs jt5rYRK3P3o4jbC1r+USq9XeSSa0q5jesWyCOknOR0TAdJvjk036/ShEegt7X8ArqXlv DodUDsuNWVQVs+S/kS4+NQ2bZSAqXZSYeskkcblCkz3nKtaZ7KMmtB7Fa15YAKRKBO1+ n3m1D7HDmEdaJ3a3e8LmaNc4Mko+VKWdBWSULAUg5fIw3OE7mw4jaJCaPYo4exp9mMa6 bLnmEDyWmtmD7EN/nr77GNDUb+FFOrecsuTXh3P4Dpvl7HlfN+5dJgPg0OdXdZJ8F44q dhnQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX799L8+vxlB5v+LOfewXNQo+brAHRveFxzu7UC9xJjQjGKnRHNN fZKbob4Chlr1P+MdWlAHLiV58Y6li5gPC15ar8015Q==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMZn+ODtac2ZbTj2U1iYMpknwgvqV01mZvwnr2SI5TzA2ocSt2rAvskWdgQb8C+4xgZxcZOJe+Y4wjYYZFZlb7A=
X-Received: by 10.46.29.13 with SMTP id d13mr5355443ljd.8.1512160796185; Fri, 01 Dec 2017 12:39:56 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: kurta@drkurt.com
Received: by 10.25.56.9 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Dec 2017 12:39:55 -0800 (PST)
From: "Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2017 20:39:55 +0000
X-Google-Sender-Auth: L0Jws9h08aZIQPRdOizpa--zGoo
Message-ID: <CABuGu1rPy5WKQbSaS_f018cca1m6TPS+SbxmXO4Z_1CTCVbxkw@mail.gmail.com>
To: art@ietf.org, ietf-822@ietf.org, smtp@ietf.org, "dmarc@ietf.org" <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c082cdc19aa4e055f4d5fcb"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-822/IHERITknKpQ7pQChdr3QZYwTwj8>
Subject: [ietf-822] Proposal to invoke a 7601bis effort
X-BeenThere: ietf-822@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of issues related to Internet Message Format \[RFC 822, RFC 2822, RFC 5322\]" <ietf-822.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-822>, <mailto:ietf-822-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-822/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-822@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-822-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-822>, <mailto:ietf-822-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2017 20:40:00 -0000

In the context of work that is happening in the DMARC-WG, some changes to
RFC7601 have been discussed which we think may merit a 'bis' effort to
revise 7601.

If you are interested or care, please join the DMARC WG where the detailed
discussion will be carried out.

(Apologies for the wide posting, but we wanted to reach a broad group of
potentially interested parties.)

--Kurt Andersen