Re: Minor standards process question
"Jeffrey I. Schiller" <jis@mit.edu> Tue, 19 March 1996 04:57 UTC
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05179; 18 Mar 96 23:57 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05175; 18 Mar 96 23:57 EST
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa00695; 18 Mar 96 23:57 EST
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05120; 18 Mar 96 23:57 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05102; 18 Mar 96 23:56 EST
Received: from BIG-SCREW.MIT.EDU by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa00685; 18 Mar 96 23:56 EST
Received: by big-screw id AA04055; Mon, 18 Mar 96 23:56:24 -0500
X-Sender: jis@e40-po.mit.edu (Unverified)
Message-Id: <ad73e58801021004d789@[18.162.1.1]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 1996 23:56:52 -0500
To: Steve Coya <scoya@CNRI.Reston.VA.US>
X-Orig-Sender: iesg-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: "Jeffrey I. Schiller" <jis@mit.edu>
Subject: Re: Minor standards process question
Cc: Ran Atkinson <rja@cisco.com>, iesg@CNRI.Reston.VA.US, palamber@us.oracle.com
At 15:54 3/14/96, Steve Coya wrote:
>FYI, Bob Baldwin just sent in two Internet-Drafts. He mentioned that
>the I-D on ESP-RC5 was intended for publication as an Informational
>RFC.
I can we put an introductory paragraph into the document (I haven't read it
yet though). Basically I want the document to clearly point out the patent
status of RC5 as well as its non-standardness.
-Jeff
- Re: Minor standards process question Jeffrey I. Schiller