Re: Informational RFC-to-be - Internet Registry IP Allocation Guidelines
Brian Carpenter CERN-CN <brian@dxcoms.cern.ch> Thu, 21 March 1996 08:28 UTC
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa08798; 21 Mar 96 3:28 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa08794; 21 Mar 96 3:28 EST
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa02908; 21 Mar 96 3:28 EST
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa08784; 21 Mar 96 3:27 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa08780; 21 Mar 96 3:27 EST
Received: from venera.isi.edu by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa02903; 21 Mar 96 3:27 EST
Received: from dxmint.cern.ch by venera.isi.edu (5.65c/5.61+local-22) id <AA00449>; Thu, 21 Mar 1996 00:27:25 -0800
Received: from dxcoms.cern.ch by dxmint.cern.ch id AA20879; Thu, 21 Mar 1996 09:27:23 +0100
Received: by dxcoms.cern.ch; (5.65v3.0/1.1.8.2/28Jul95-0949AM) id AA10076; Thu, 21 Mar 1996 09:27:22 +0100
Message-Id: <9603210827.AA10076@dxcoms.cern.ch>
Subject: Re: Informational RFC-to-be - Internet Registry IP Allocation Guidelines
To: jkrey@isi.edu
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 1996 09:27:22 +0100
X-Orig-Sender: iesg-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Brian Carpenter CERN-CN <brian@dxcoms.cern.ch>
Cc: sob@newdev.harvard.edu, kimh@internic.net, rfc-editor@isi.edu, iesg@isi.edu
In-Reply-To: <199603202002.AA12591@akamai.isi.edu> from "jkrey@isi.edu" at Mar 20, 96 12:02:59 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 396
Great minds think alike Joyce. Yesterday, I requested IAB members to review this, and sent some personal comments to the authors. If the document makes any kind of sense, it should go to BCP in my view. Brian > > > Scott and IESG: > > The "Internet Registry IP Allocation Guidelines" RFC-to-be was reviewed > at the CIDRD WG meeting in Los Angeles. What is its status? > > Joyce > >
- Re: Informational RFC-to-be - Internet Registry I… jkrey
- Re: Informational RFC-to-be - Internet Registry I… Scott Bradner
- Re: Informational RFC-to-be - Internet Registry I… Brian Carpenter CERN-CN
- Re: Informational RFC-to-be - Internet Registry I… jkrey
- Re: Informational RFC-to-be - Internet Registry I… jkrey
- Re: Informational RFC-to-be - Internet Registry I… Kim Hubbard