Re: [Ietf-and-github] BoF meeting in Chicago

[Martin Thomson <[e-mail]>]

I don't have any concerns with how we spend the time, but I do want to
ask what we think the focus should be, see below.

On 12 March 2017 at 12:34, Paul Hoffman <[e-mail]> wrote:
> Roll call of WGs actively using GitHub - 10 minutes
>    Let people in the room see people whom they talk to later

Want to start the roll-call here so that we can at least include a
seed list?  Not all of the relevant people are going to be in the
room.

I assume that you want a 10 second synopsis of what it is used for at
the meeting (the Readers Digest version of what the github-bcp draft
appendicies includes).

> Third-party services, draft-nottingham-wugh-services - 10 mins
> Basics of WGs using GitHub, draft-thomson-github-bcp - 20 mins

It would be good if we can try to focus on addressing some questions.
Both of these drafts imply some questions, if only the question of "is
this something that makes sense as an RFC?", but we might want to try
to find some concrete actions other than the movement of paper.

I don't think that we're going to have people mandate or forbid any
particular work mode, but we might want to consider whether there is
any desire to ask the Secretariat for specific types of support, for
example.