RFC 3662 on A Lower Effort Per-Domain Behavior (PDB) for Differentiated Services
rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Fri, 19 December 2003 00:42 UTC
Received: from asgard.ietf.org (asgard.ietf.org [10.27.6.40]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id TAA02215 for <ietf-announce-web-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Dec 2003 19:42:20 -0500 (EST)
Received: from majordomo by asgard.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.14) id 1AX8cy-0001mq-Bt for ietf-announce-list@asgard.ietf.org; Thu, 18 Dec 2003 19:36:24 -0500
Received: from ietf.org ([10.27.2.28]) by asgard.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1AX8cW-0001m3-Iw for all-ietf@asgard.ietf.org; Thu, 18 Dec 2003 19:35:56 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id TAA01615 for <all-ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Dec 2003 19:35:53 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AX8cV-0002ve-00 for all-ietf@ietf.org; Thu, 18 Dec 2003 19:35:55 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AX8cU-0002vX-00 for all-ietf@ietf.org; Thu, 18 Dec 2003 19:35:54 -0500
Received: from gamma.isi.edu ([128.9.144.145]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AX8cT-0002vU-00 for all-ietf@ietf.org; Thu, 18 Dec 2003 19:35:53 -0500
Received: from ISI.EDU (jet.isi.edu [128.9.160.87]) by gamma.isi.edu (8.11.6p2+0917/8.11.2) with ESMTP id hBJ0Zrs23480; Thu, 18 Dec 2003 16:35:53 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <200312190035.hBJ0Zrs23480@gamma.isi.edu>
To: IETF-Announce:;
Subject: RFC 3662 on A Lower Effort Per-Domain Behavior (PDB) for Differentiated Services
Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Multipart/Mixed; Boundary="NextPart"
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 16:35:53 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,MIME_BOUND_NEXTPART, NO_REAL_NAME,USER_IN_DEF_WHITELIST autolearn=no version=2.60
Sender: owner-ietf-announce@ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 3662 Title: A Lower Effort Per-Domain Behavior (PDB) for Differentiated Services Author(s): R. Bless, K. Nichols, K. Wehrle Status: Informational Date: December 2003 Mailbox: bless@tm.uka.de, knichols@ieee.org, Klaus.Wehrle@uni-tuebingen.de Pages: 17 Characters: 39029 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-bless-diffserv-pdb-le-01.txt URL: ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc3662.txt This document proposes a differentiated services per-domain behavior (PDB) whose traffic may be "starved" (although starvation is not strictly required) in a properly functioning network. This is in contrast to the Internet's "best-effort" or "normal Internet traffic" model, where prolonged starvation indicates network problems. In this sense, the proposed PDB's traffic is forwarded with a "lower" priority than the normal "best-effort" Internet traffic, thus the PDB is called "Lower Effort" (LE). Use of this PDB permits a network operator to strictly limit the effect of its traffic on "best-effort"/"normal" or all other Internet traffic. This document gives some example uses, but does not propose constraining the PDB's use to any particular type of traffic. This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF list and the RFC-DIST list. Requests to be added to or deleted from the IETF distribution list should be sent to IETF-REQUEST@IETF.ORG. Requests to be added to or deleted from the RFC-DIST distribution list should be sent to RFC-DIST-REQUEST@RFC-EDITOR.ORG. Details on obtaining RFCs via FTP or EMAIL may be obtained by sending an EMAIL message to rfc-info@RFC-EDITOR.ORG with the message body help: ways_to_get_rfcs. For example: To: rfc-info@RFC-EDITOR.ORG Subject: getting rfcs help: ways_to_get_rfcs Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to RFC-Manager@RFC-EDITOR.ORG. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution.echo Submissions for Requests for Comments should be sent to RFC-EDITOR@RFC-EDITOR.ORG. Please consult RFC 2223, Instructions to RFC Authors, for further information. Joyce K. Reynolds and Sandy Ginoza USC/Information Sciences Institute ... Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant Mail Reader implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the RFCs.