51st IETF - Transport Layer Security WG
agenda@ietf.org Tue, 31 July 2001 21:16 UTC
Received: from loki.ietf.org (loki [10.27.2.29]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA22588; Tue, 31 Jul 2001 17:16:50 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from adm@localhost) by loki.ietf.org (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1) id RAA10324 for ietf-123-outbound.10@ietf.org; Tue, 31 Jul 2001 17:15:01 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [10.27.2.28]) by loki.ietf.org (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA08496 for <all-ietf@loki.ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Jul 2001 15:29:14 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA13511 for <all-ietf>; Tue, 31 Jul 2001 15:29:12 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <200107311929.PAA13511@ietf.org>
To: ietf-announce:;
From: agenda@ietf.org
Subject: 51st IETF - Transport Layer Security WG
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2001 15:29:12 -0400
Sender: dinaras@cnri.reston.va.us
Transport Layer Security WG (tls) Wednesday, August 08 at 1300-1500 =============================== CHAIR: Win Treese <treese@acm.org> AGENDA: 1. Review of agenda and current status (5 minutes) 2. Moving RFC 2246 to Draft Standard (10 minutes) 3. Other Proposals (30 minutes) TLS Extensions draft-ietf-tls-extensions-00.txt TLS Delegation Protocol draft-ietf-tls-delegation-01.txt Using SRP for TLS Authentication draft-ietf-tls-srp-01.txt Putting extensions on TLS roadmap -- what version of TLS? when? 4. CipherSuites (1 hour) AES Ciphersuites for TLS draft-ietf-tls-ciphersuite-03.txt draft-ietf-tls-ciphersuite-04.txt ECC Cipher Suites For TLS draft-ietf-tls-ecc-01.txt 56-bit Export Cipher Suites For TLS draft-ietf-tls-56-bit-ciphersuites-01.txt Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP keys draft-ietf-tls-openpgp-01.txt Addition of MISTY1 to TLS draft-ietf-tls-misty1-01.txt Addition of the Camellia Encryption Algorithm to TLS draft-ietf-tls-camellia-01.txt Kerberos Cipher Suites in Transport Layer Security (TLS) draft-ietf-tls-kerb-00.txt NTRU Cipher Suites for TLS draft-ietf-tls-ntru-00.txt 5. Open discussion (15 minutes): should the WG undertake to define a major revision to TLS? If so, what changes should we focus on?