RFC 8889 on Multipoint Alternate-Marking Method for Passive and Hybrid Performance Monitoring
rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Thu, 27 August 2020 01:45 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-announce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-announce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 475E23A0C3D; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 18:45:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GOtDjp94FBSI; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 18:45:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F6073A0C39; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 18:45:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id AB96AF40780; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 18:45:26 -0700 (PDT)
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Subject: RFC 8889 on Multipoint Alternate-Marking Method for Passive and Hybrid Performance Monitoring
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, drafts-update-ref@iana.org, ippm@ietf.org
Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20200827014526.AB96AF40780@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 18:45:26 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-announce/0-6PQ8BqSRsO-FFOgsUoOwGlH_c>
X-BeenThere: ietf-announce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IETF announcement list. No discussions." <ietf-announce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-announce>, <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-announce/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-announce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce>, <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 01:45:34 -0000
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
RFC 8889
Title: Multipoint Alternate-Marking Method for Passive
and Hybrid Performance Monitoring
Author: G. Fioccola, Ed.,
M. Cociglio,
A. Sapio,
R. Sisto
Status: Experimental
Stream: IETF
Date: August 2020
Mailbox: giuseppe.fioccola@huawei.com,
mauro.cociglio@telecomitalia.it,
amedeo.sapio@intel.com,
riccardo.sisto@polito.it
Pages: 23
Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None
I-D Tag: draft-ietf-ippm-multipoint-alt-mark-09.txt
URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8889
DOI: 10.17487/RFC8889
The Alternate-Marking method, as presented in RFC 8321, can only be
applied to point-to-point flows, because it assumes that all the
packets of the flow measured on one node are measured again by a
single second node. This document generalizes and expands this
methodology to measure any kind of unicast flow whose packets can
follow several different paths in the network -- in wider terms, a
multipoint-to-multipoint network. For this reason, the technique
here described is called "Multipoint Alternate Marking".
This document is a product of the IP Performance Measurement Working Group of the IETF.
EXPERIMENTAL: This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the
Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any
kind. Discussion and suggestions for improvement are requested.
Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search
For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk
Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.
The RFC Editor Team
Association Management Solutions, LLC