Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-vinapamula-softwire-dslite-prefix-binding-12

The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> Mon, 07 December 2015 18:05 UTC

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: Nevil Brownlee <rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org>, rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org, draft-vinapamula-softwire-dslite-prefix-binding@ietf.org
Subject: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-vinapamula-softwire-dslite-prefix-binding-12
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <20151207180545.18989.74583.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2015 10:05:45 -0800
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-announce/57s4ZBymw2ZcYwe_-xWQdXl498I>
Cc: iana@iana.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org

The IESG has completed a review of
draft-vinapamula-softwire-dslite-prefix-binding-12 consistent with
RFC5742.


The IESG has no problem with the publication of 'Recommendations for
Prefix Binding in the Softwire DS-Lite Context'
<draft-vinapamula-softwire-dslite-prefix-binding-12.txt> as an
Informational RFC.


The IESG has concluded that this work is related to IETF work done in WG
SOFTWIRE, but this relationship does not prevent publishing.



The IESG would also like the RFC-Editor to review the comments in the
datatracker related to this document and determine whether or not they
merit incorporation into the document. Comments may exist in both the
ballot and the history log.

The IESG review is documented at:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/conflict-review-vinapamula-softwire-dslite-prefix-binding/

A URL of the reviewed Internet Draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-vinapamula-softwire-dslite-prefix-binding/

The process for such documents is described at
https://www.rfc-editor.org/indsubs.html 

Thank you,

The IESG Secretary

Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-vinapam… The IESG