Last Call: <draft-eggert-bcp45bis-07.txt> (IETF Discussion List Charter) to Best Current Practice
The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> Mon, 10 January 2022 14:36 UTC
Return-Path: <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-announce@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietf-announce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37F863A118E; Mon, 10 Jan 2022 06:36:05 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
Subject: Last Call: <draft-eggert-bcp45bis-07.txt> (IETF Discussion List Charter) to Best Current Practice
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.42.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
CC: draft-eggert-bcp45bis@ietf.org, rwilton@cisco.com, ietf@ietf.org
Reply-To: last-call@ietf.org
Sender: iesg-secretary@ietf.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <164182536443.26752.763615095887134371@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2022 06:36:05 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-announce/6rkVEiHRSDnYJUTXlbg0ZvSl7Sc>
X-BeenThere: ietf-announce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "IETF announcement list. No discussions." <ietf-announce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-announce>, <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-announce/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-announce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce>, <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2022 14:36:05 -0000
Responsible AD note: I have asked for a second 4 week last call on this AD sponsored document for two reasons: (1) I should have included ietf@ietf.org in the original last call notice because this mailing list is directly affected by this proposed BCP. Please note, as per the Reply-To, any last-call discussion should happen on last-call@ietf.org and not be automatically copied on ietf@ietf.org. (2) Based on the last call feedback received, there have been some moderate changes to the draft during the last call process (between -06 and -07) and a second last call gives the community an opportunity to review and comment on those changes, and to ensure that there is community consensus to publish. The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider the following document: - 'IETF Discussion List Charter' <draft-eggert-bcp45bis-07.txt> as Best Current Practice The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the last-call@ietf.org mailing lists by 2022-02-07. Exceptionally, comments may be sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. Abstract The Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) discussion mailing list furthers the development and specification of Internet technology through the general discussion of topics for which no dedicated mailing lists exists. As this is the most general IETF mailing list, considerable latitude is allowed, but there are posts and topics that are unsuitable for this mailing list. This document obsoletes RFC3005. The file can be obtained via https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-eggert-bcp45bis/ No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.