Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-huitema-rfc-eval-project-07
The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> Mon, 09 November 2020 17:01 UTC
Return-Path: <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-announce@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietf-announce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A92713A1242; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 09:01:37 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org, draft-huitema-rfc-eval-project@ietf.org, Adrian Farrel <rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org>
Subject: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-huitema-rfc-eval-project-07
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.21.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>, iana@iana.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <160494129767.11145.5941383514554615867@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2020 09:01:37 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-announce/DZVkB8gwGMOG7Q4WUxCJ8S-Zk-g>
X-BeenThere: ietf-announce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "IETF announcement list. No discussions." <ietf-announce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-announce>, <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-announce/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-announce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce>, <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2020 17:01:38 -0000
The IESG has completed a review of draft-huitema-rfc-eval-project-07 consistent with RFC5742. The IESG has no problem with the publication of 'Evaluation of a Sample of RFC Produced in 2018' <draft-huitema-rfc-eval-project-07.txt> as an Informational RFC. The IESG has concluded that there is no conflict between this document and IETF work. The IESG would also like the Independent Submissions Editor to review the comments in the datatracker related to this document and determine whether or not they merit incorporation into the document. Comments may exist in both the ballot and the history log. The IESG review is documented at: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/conflict-review-huitema-rfc-eval-project/ A URL of the reviewed Internet Draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-huitema-rfc-eval-project/ The process for such documents is described at https://www.rfc-editor.org/indsubs.html Thank you, The IESG Secretary