Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-irtf-cfrg-pake-reqs-07
The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> Mon, 06 February 2017 21:53 UTC
Return-Path: <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-announce@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietf-announce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ED2F12951A; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 13:53:10 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: draft-irtf-cfrg-pake-reqs@ietf.org, irsg@irtf.org, Internet Research Steering Group <irsg@irtf.org>, irtf-chair@irtf.org, cfrg-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-irtf-cfrg-pake-reqs-07
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.42.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <148641799058.18869.17557490679842497980.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2017 13:53:10 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-announce/FCtc-Ao3UJolFJzEQ7RE12TsLUM>
Cc: iana@iana.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf-announce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org
List-Id: "IETF announcement list. No discussions." <ietf-announce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-announce>, <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-announce/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-announce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce>, <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2017 21:53:10 -0000
The IESG has completed a review of draft-irtf-cfrg-pake-reqs-07 consistent with RFC5742. The IESG has no problem with the publication of 'Requirements for PAKE schemes' <draft-irtf-cfrg-pake-reqs-07.txt> as an Informational RFC. The IESG has concluded that there is no conflict between this document and IETF work. The IESG would also like the IRTF to review the comments in the datatracker related to this document and determine whether or not they merit incorporation into the document. Comments may exist in both the ballot and the history log. The IESG review is documented at: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/conflict-review-irtf-cfrg-pake-reqs/ A URL of the reviewed Internet Draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-cfrg-pake-reqs/ The process for such documents is described in RFC 5743 Thank you, The IESG Secretary