Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-vinapamula-flow-ha-14
The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> Mon, 23 November 2015 18:59 UTC
Return-Path: <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-announce@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietf-announce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CEDD1ACDBF; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 10:59:48 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: draft-vinapamula-flow-ha@ietf.org, Nevil Brownlee <rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org>, rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org
Subject: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-vinapamula-flow-ha-14
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.11.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <20151123185948.21087.4761.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 10:59:48 -0800
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-announce/Hne24wWsdll8qRYyFo34-spOBH8>
Cc: iana@iana.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf-announce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org
List-Id: "IETF announcement list. No discussions." <ietf-announce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-announce>, <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-announce/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-announce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce>, <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 18:59:48 -0000
The IESG has completed a review of draft-vinapamula-flow-ha-14 consistent with RFC5742. The IESG has no problem with the publication of 'Application-Initiated Flow High Availability Awareness through Port Control Protocol (PCP)' <draft-vinapamula-flow-ha-14.txt> as an Informational RFC. The IESG has concluded that this work is related to IETF work done in the PCP WG, but this relationship does not prevent publishing. The IESG would also like the RFC-Editor to review the comments in the datatracker related to this document and determine whether or not they merit incorporation into the document. Comments may exist in both the ballot and the history log. The IESG review is documented at: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/conflict-review-vinapamula-flow-ha/ A URL of the reviewed Internet Draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-vinapamula-flow-ha/ The process for such documents is described at https://www.rfc-editor.org/indsubs.html Thank you, The IESG Secretary