BCP 239, RFC 9501 on Open Participation Principle regarding Remote Registration Fee
rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Fri, 15 December 2023 20:32 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-announce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-announce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 681D3C14F68A; Fri, 15 Dec 2023 12:32:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.658
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.658 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, CTE_8BIT_MISMATCH=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VD_G1f4YwNHx; Fri, 15 Dec 2023 12:32:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfcpa.amsl.com [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 210FEC14F5F6; Fri, 15 Dec 2023 12:32:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id D28A8E7EE4; Fri, 15 Dec 2023 12:32:36 -0800 (PST)
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Subject: BCP 239, RFC 9501 on Open Participation Principle regarding Remote Registration Fee
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, drafts-update-ref@iana.org, manycouches@ietf.org
Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20231215203236.D28A8E7EE4@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2023 12:32:36 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-announce/HrYD3JHaKGYtodKyPPvhDq3MKf0>
X-BeenThere: ietf-announce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IETF announcement list. No discussions." <ietf-announce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-announce>, <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-announce/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-announce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce>, <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2023 20:32:41 -0000
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
BCP 239
RFC 9501
Title: Open Participation Principle regarding
Remote Registration Fee
Author: M. Kühlewind,
J. Reed,
R. Salz
Status: Best Current Practice
Stream: IETF
Date: December 2023
Mailbox: mirja.kuehlewind@ericsson.com,
jreed@akamai.com,
rsalz@akamai.com
Pages: 6
See Also: BCP 239
I-D Tag: draft-ietf-shmoo-remote-fee-09.txt
URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9501
DOI: 10.17487/RFC9501
This document outlines a principle for open participation that
extends the open process principle defined in RFC 3935 by stating
that there must be a free option for online participation to IETF
meetings and, if possible, related IETF-hosted events.
This document is a product of the Stay Home Meet Occasionally Online Working Group of the IETF.
BCP: This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the
Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
improvements. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search
For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk
Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.
The RFC Editor Team
Association Management Solutions, LLC