Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-irtf-nmrg-autonomic-network-definitions-06

The IESG <> Mon, 16 March 2015 21:40 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id D75531A924A; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 14:40:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.9
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RrXcTiILTCCq; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 14:40:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96DD61A9232; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 14:40:28 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: The IESG <>
Subject: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-irtf-nmrg-autonomic-network-definitions-06
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 5.12.2
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 14:40:28 -0700
Archived-At: <>
Cc:, The IESG <>,
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
List-Id: "IETF announcement list. No discussions." <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 21:40:30 -0000

The IESG has completed a review of
draft-irtf-nmrg-autonomic-network-definitions-06 consistent with RFC5742.

The IESG has no problem with the publication of 'Autonomic Networking -
Definitions and Design Goals'
<draft-irtf-nmrg-autonomic-network-definitions-06.txt> as an
Informational RFC.

The IESG has concluded that this work is related to IETF work done in the
ANIMA working group, but this relationship does not prevent publishing.

At the time of the ANIMA working group creation, this work was well
underway, and was therefore mentioned in the ANIMA charter. The ANIMA
working group will build on the definitions in this document.

The IESG would also like the IRTF to review the comments in the
datatracker related to this document and determine whether or not they
merit incorporation into the document. Comments may exist in both the
ballot and the history log.

The IESG review is documented at:

A URL of the reviewed Internet Draft is:

The process for such documents is described in RFC 5743  

Thank you,

The IESG Secretary