Protocol Action: 'Fibre-Channel Routing Information MIB' to Proposed Standard
The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> Tue, 16 May 2006 16:29 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fg2QT-0006gH-1U; Tue, 16 May 2006 12:29:37 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fg2QR-0006fW-NX; Tue, 16 May 2006 12:29:35 -0400
Received: from stsc1260-eth-s1-s1p1-vip.va.neustar.com ([156.154.16.129] helo=pine.neustar.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fg2QR-0008So-Ec; Tue, 16 May 2006 12:29:35 -0400
Received: from stiedprstage1.ietf.org (stiedprstage1.va.neustar.com [10.31.47.10]) by pine.neustar.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4GGT7XO028859 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 16 May 2006 16:29:08 GMT
Received: from ietf by stiedprstage1.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Fg2Pz-0007HY-Qy; Tue, 16 May 2006 12:29:07 -0400
X-test-idtracker: no
From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <E1Fg2Pz-0007HY-Qy@stiedprstage1.ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 12:29:07 -0400
X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--)
X-Scan-Signature: ff03b0075c3fc728d7d60a15b4ee1ad2
Cc: imss mailing list <imss@ietf.org>, Internet Architecture Board <iab@iab.org>, imss chair <black_david@emc.com>, RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Subject: Protocol Action: 'Fibre-Channel Routing Information MIB' to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: ietf-announce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: ietf-announce.ietf.org
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce>, <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-announce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce>, <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ietf-announce-bounces@ietf.org
The IESG has approved the following document: - 'Fibre-Channel Routing Information MIB ' <draft-ietf-imss-fc-rtm-mib-04.txt> as a Proposed Standard This document is the product of the Internet and Management Support for Storage Working Group. The IESG contact persons are Dan Romascanu and David Kessens. A URL of this Internet-Draft is: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-imss-fc-rtm-mib-04.txt Technical Summary This memo defines a portion of the Management Information Base (MIB) for use with network management protocols in the Internet community. In particular, it describes managed objects for information related to routing within a Fibre Channel fabric which is independent of the usage of a particular routing protocol. Working Group Summary This document was reviewed in the IMSS WG and in Technical Committee T11 (the official Fibre Channel standards body). T11 voted to recommend a prior version of this document to the IETF. Protocol Quality The protocol has been reviewed for the imss WG by Keith McCloghrie and for the Operations and Management Area by Bert Wijnen. Note to RFC Editor Please make the following changes: 1) Append to Section 1 the following paragraph: NEW: The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119. 2) Add to Normative References the Following [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997. 3) In Section 12: OLD: It is recommended that implementors consider the security features as provided by the SNMPv3 framework (see [RFC3410], section 8), including full support for the SNMPv3 cryptographic mechanisms (for authentication and privacy). Further, deployment of SNMP versions prior to SNMPv3 is NOT recommended. Instead, it is recommended to deploy SNMPv3 and to enable cryptographic security. NEW: It is RECOMMENDED that implementors consider the security features as provided by the SNMPv3 framework (see [RFC3410], section 8), including full support for the SNMPv3 cryptographic mechanisms (for authentication and privacy). Further, deployment of SNMP versions prior to SNMPv3 is NOT RECOMMENDED. Instead, it is RECOMMENDED to deploy SNMPv3 and to enable cryptographic security. 4) Section 3, create sub-section 3.1 Replace OLD: 3. Short Overview of Fibre Channel With NEW: 3. Short Overview of Fibre Channel 3.1 Introduction 5) Section 3, create sub-section 3.2 Replace OLD: The routing of frames within the Fabric is normally based on the standard routing protocol, called the Fabric Shortest Path First ... With NEW: 3.2 Routing Protocols The routing of frames within the Fabric is normally based on the standard routing protocol, called the Fabric Shortest Path First ... 6) Section 3, create sub-section 3.3 Replace OLD: The latest standard for an interconnecting Fabric containing multiple Fabric Switch elements is [FC-SW-4] (which replaces the previous ... With NEW: 3.3 Virtual Fabrics The latest standard for an interconnecting Fabric containing multiple Fabric Switch elements is [FC-SW-4] (which replaces the previous ... IANA Note IANA is requested to make an MIB OID assignment for the T11-FC-ROUTE- MIB module under mib-2 _______________________________________________ IETF-Announce mailing list IETF-Announce@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce