RFC 3750 on Unmanaged Networks IPv6 Transition Scenarios
rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Wed, 14 April 2004 13:53 UTC
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA24979 for <ietf-announce-archive@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Apr 2004 09:53:46 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BDkpo-0007h1-00 for ietf-announce-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 14 Apr 2004 09:53:48 -0400
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BDkou-0007Wq-00 for ietf-announce-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 14 Apr 2004 09:52:53 -0400
Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BDknz-0007LV-00 for ietf-announce-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 14 Apr 2004 09:51:55 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BDkVp-0008Nw-0w; Wed, 14 Apr 2004 09:33:09 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BDXLC-0008NG-6d for ietf-announce@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 13 Apr 2004 19:29:18 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id TAA19356 for <ietf-announce@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Apr 2004 19:29:17 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BDXLA-0007Wx-00 for ietf-announce@ietf.org; Tue, 13 Apr 2004 19:29:16 -0400
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BDXIO-0007Co-00 for ietf-announce@ietf.org; Tue, 13 Apr 2004 19:26:25 -0400
Received: from boreas.isi.edu ([128.9.160.161]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BDXF9-0006qA-00 for ietf-announce@ietf.org; Tue, 13 Apr 2004 19:23:04 -0400
Received: from ISI.EDU (adma.isi.edu [128.9.160.239]) by boreas.isi.edu (8.11.6p2+0917/8.11.2) with ESMTP id i3DNMoN08324; Tue, 13 Apr 2004 16:22:50 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <200404132322.i3DNMoN08324@boreas.isi.edu>
To: IETF-Announce:;
Subject: RFC 3750 on Unmanaged Networks IPv6 Transition Scenarios
Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, v6ops@ops.ietf.org
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Multipart/Mixed; Boundary="NextPart"
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 16:22:50 -0700
X-ISI-4-28-6-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: rfc-ed@isi.edu
Sender: ietf-announce-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-announce-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf-announce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce>, <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: <ietf-announce.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-announce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce>, <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,MIME_BOUND_NEXTPART, NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 3750 Title: Unmanaged Networks IPv6 Transition Scenarios Author(s): C. Huitema, R. Austein, S. Satapati, R. van der Pol Status: Informational Date: April 2004 Mailbox: huitema@microsoft.com, sra@isc.org, satapati@cisco.com, Ronald.vanderPol@nlnetlabs.nl Pages: 20 Characters: 48153 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-v6ops-unman-scenarios-03.txt URL: ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc3750.txt This document defines the scenarios in which IPv6 transition mechanisms are to be used in unmanaged networks. In order to evaluate the suitability of these mechanisms, we need to define the scenarios in which these mechanisms have to be used. One specific scope is the "unmanaged network", which typically corresponds to a home or small office network. The scenarios are specific to a single subnet, and are defined in terms of IP connectivity supported by the gateway and the Internet Service Provider (ISP). We first examine the generic requirements of four classes of applications: local, client, peer to peer and server. Then, for each scenario, we infer transition requirements by analyzing the needs for smooth migration of applications from IPv4 to IPv6. This document is a product of the IPv6 Operations Working Group of the IETF. This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF list and the RFC-DIST list. Requests to be added to or deleted from the IETF distribution list should be sent to IETF-REQUEST@IETF.ORG. Requests to be added to or deleted from the RFC-DIST distribution list should be sent to RFC-DIST-REQUEST@RFC-EDITOR.ORG. Details on obtaining RFCs via FTP or EMAIL may be obtained by sending an EMAIL message to rfc-info@RFC-EDITOR.ORG with the message body help: ways_to_get_rfcs. For example: To: rfc-info@RFC-EDITOR.ORG Subject: getting rfcs help: ways_to_get_rfcs Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to RFC-Manager@RFC-EDITOR.ORG. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution.echo Submissions for Requests for Comments should be sent to RFC-EDITOR@RFC-EDITOR.ORG. Please consult RFC 2223, Instructions to RFC Authors, for further information. Joyce K. Reynolds and Sandy Ginoza USC/Information Sciences Institute ... Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant Mail Reader implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the RFCs.