RFC 9301 on Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP) Control Plane

rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Thu, 20 October 2022 21:08 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-announce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-announce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0675AC1524B5 for <ietf-announce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 14:08:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.959
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.959 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H1eHLwLHQLBT for <ietf-announce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 14:08:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfc-editor.org [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 034B9C14F724 for <ietf-announce@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 14:07:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id EC02515D30D; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 14:07:07 -0700 (PDT)
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Subject: RFC 9301 on Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP) Control Plane
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, drafts-update-ref@iana.org
Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20221020210707.EC02515D30D@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 14:07:07 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-announce/OMaP05prekxWCphtLQvHCb1FDIQ>
X-BeenThere: ietf-announce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IETF announcement list. No discussions." <ietf-announce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-announce>, <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-announce/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-announce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce>, <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 21:08:35 -0000

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.

        
        RFC 9301

        Title:      Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP) Control Plane 
        Author:     D. Farinacci,
                    F. Maino,
                    V. Fuller,
                    A. Cabellos, Ed.
        Status:     Standards Track
        Stream:     IETF
        Date:       October 2022
        Mailbox:    farinacci@gmail.com,
                    fmaino@cisco.com,
                    vince.fuller@gmail.com,
                    acabello@ac.upc.edu
        Pages:      42
        Obsoletes:  RFC 6830, RFC 6833

        I-D Tag:    draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6833bis-31.txt

        URL:        https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9301

        DOI:        10.17487/RFC9301

This document describes the control plane and Mapping Service for the
Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP), implemented by two types of
LISP-speaking devices -- the LISP Map-Resolver and LISP Map-Server --
that provide a simplified "front end" for one or more Endpoint IDs
(EIDs) to Routing Locator mapping databases.

By using this control plane service interface and communicating with
Map-Resolvers and Map-Servers, LISP Ingress Tunnel Routers (ITRs) and
Egress Tunnel Routers (ETRs) are not dependent on the details of
mapping database systems; this behavior facilitates modularity with
different database designs.  Since these devices implement the "edge"
of the LISP control plane infrastructure, connecting EID addressable
nodes of a LISP site, the implementation and operational complexity
of the overall cost and effort of deploying LISP is reduced.

This document obsoletes RFCs 6830 and 6833.

This document is a product of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol Working Group of the IETF.

This is now a Proposed Standard.

STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track
protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions
for improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the Official
Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the 
standardization state and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this 
memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
  https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist

For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search
For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.


The RFC Editor Team
Association Management Solutions, LLC