RFC 5556 on Transparent Interconnection of Lots of Links (TRILL): Problem and Applicability Statement
rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Tue, 19 May 2009 21:54 UTC
Return-Path: <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-announce@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-announce@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09E513A7098 for <ietf-announce@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 May 2009 14:54:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.258
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.258 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.341, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_DEF_WHITELIST=-15]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UN6K3r9k4tpk for <ietf-announce@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 May 2009 14:54:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bosco.isi.edu (bosco.isi.edu [128.9.168.207]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3F893A6B8A for <ietf-announce@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 May 2009 14:54:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by bosco.isi.edu (Postfix, from userid 70) id C65522B1C03; Tue, 19 May 2009 14:55:27 -0700 (PDT)
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Subject: RFC 5556 on Transparent Interconnection of Lots of Links (TRILL): Problem and Applicability Statement
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Message-Id: <20090519215527.C65522B1C03@bosco.isi.edu>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 14:55:27 -0700
Cc: rbridge@postel.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
X-BeenThere: ietf-announce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IETF announcement list. No discussions." <ietf-announce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce>, <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-announce>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-announce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce>, <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 21:54:16 -0000
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 5556 Title: Transparent Interconnection of Lots of Links (TRILL): Problem and Applicability Statement Author: J. Touch, R. Perlman Status: Informational Date: May 2009 Mailbox: touch@isi.edu, Radia.Perlman@sun.com Pages: 17 Characters: 41657 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-trill-prob-06.txt URL: http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5556.txt Current IEEE 802.1 LANs use spanning tree protocols that have a number of challenges. These protocols need to strictly avoid loops, even temporary ones, during route propagation, because of the lack of header loop detection support. Routing tends not to take full advantage of alternate paths, or even non-overlapping pairwise paths (in the case of spanning trees). This document addresses these concerns and suggests applying modern network-layer routing protocols at the link layer. This document assumes that solutions would not address issues of scalability beyond that of existing IEEE 802.1 bridged links, but that a solution would be backward compatible with 802.1, including hubs, bridges, and their existing plug-and-play capabilities. This memo provides information for the Internet community. This document is a product of the Transparent Interconnection of Lots of Links Working Group of the IETF. INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce http://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfcsearch.html. For downloading RFCs, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc.html. Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team USC/Information Sciences Institute