Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-rundgren-json-canonicalization-scheme-16

The IESG <> Mon, 23 December 2019 21:30 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BDFD120043; Mon, 23 Dec 2019 13:30:34 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: The IESG <>
To: "Adrian Farrel" <>, <>, <>,
Subject: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-rundgren-json-canonicalization-scheme-16
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.115.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Cc: IETF-Announce <>, The IESG <>,
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <>
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2019 13:30:34 -0800
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "IETF announcement list. No discussions." <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2019 21:30:35 -0000

The IESG has completed a review of
draft-rundgren-json-canonicalization-scheme-16 consistent with RFC5742.

The IESG has no problem with the publication of 'JSON Canonicalization Scheme
(JCS)' <draft-rundgren-json-canonicalization-scheme-16.txt> as an
Informational RFC.

The IESG has concluded that there is no conflict between this document and
IETF work.

The IESG would also like the Independent Submissions Editor to review the
comments in the datatracker related to this document and determine whether or
not they merit incorporation into the document. Comments may exist in both
the ballot and the history log.

The IESG review is documented at:

A URL of the reviewed Internet Draft is:

The process for such documents is described at

Thank you,

The IESG Secretary