Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-historic-simple-ip-03

The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> Mon, 15 October 2018 17:02 UTC

Return-Path: <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-announce@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietf-announce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD01C130DC0; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 10:02:17 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: Adrian Farrel <rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org>, rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org, draft-historic-simple-ip@ietf.org
Subject: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-historic-simple-ip-03
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.87.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Cc: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, iana@iana.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <153962293782.18693.9013138637277705262.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2018 10:02:17 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-announce/TW0ATSlcIYoyvk1MkAPtkGvz5AI>
X-BeenThere: ietf-announce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "IETF announcement list. No discussions." <ietf-announce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-announce>, <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-announce/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-announce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce>, <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2018 17:02:18 -0000

The IESG has completed a review of draft-historic-simple-ip-03 consistent
with RFC5742.

The IESG has no problem with the publication of 'Simple Internet Protocol
(SIP) Specification' <draft-historic-simple-ip-03.txt> as an Historic RFC.

The IESG has concluded that this work is related to IETF work done in the
6man working group, but this relationship does not prevent publishing.

The IESG would also like the Independent Submissions Editor to review the
comments in the datatracker related to this document and determine whether or
not they merit incorporation into the document. Comments may exist in both
the ballot and the history log.

The IESG review is documented at:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/conflict-review-historic-simple-ip/

A URL of the reviewed Internet Draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-historic-simple-ip/

The process for such documents is described at
https://www.rfc-editor.org/indsubs.html

Thank you,

The IESG Secretary