Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-uri-get-off-my-lawn-04.txt> (URI Design and Ownership) to Best Current Practice
The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> Wed, 23 April 2014 12:44 UTC
Return-Path: <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-announce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-announce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 688261A0366; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 05:44:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X2Pg4BBDgxDm; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 05:44:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCC491A0377; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 05:44:20 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
Subject: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-uri-get-off-my-lawn-04.txt> (URI Design and Ownership) to Best Current Practice
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 5.3.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Sender: iesg-secretary@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20140423124420.16675.61666.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 05:44:20 -0700
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-announce/batIsvPmOu99gmbacEQQmCx4gRk
Cc: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf-announce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org
List-Id: "IETF announcement list. No discussions." <ietf-announce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-announce>, <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-announce/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-announce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce>, <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 12:44:23 -0000
The IESG has received a request from the Applications Area Working Group WG (appsawg) to consider the following document: - 'URI Design and Ownership' <draft-ietf-appsawg-uri-get-off-my-lawn-04.txt> as Best Current Practice The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2014-05-07. Exceptionally, comments may be sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. Abstract RFC3986 Section 1.1.1 defines URI syntax as "a federated and extensible naming system wherein each scheme's specification may further restrict the syntax and semantics of identifiers using that scheme." In other words, the structure of a URI is defined by its scheme. While it is common for schemes to further delegate their substructure to the URI's owner, publishing independent standards that mandate particular forms of URI substructure is inappropriate, because that essentially usurps ownership. This document further describes this problematic practice and provides some acceptable alternatives for use in standards. The file can be obtained via http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-uri-get-off-my-lawn/ IESG discussion can be tracked via http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-uri-get-off-my-lawn/ballot/ No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.