Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-uri-get-off-my-lawn-04.txt> (URI Design and Ownership) to Best Current Practice

The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> Wed, 23 April 2014 12:44 UTC

Return-Path: <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-announce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-announce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 688261A0366; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 05:44:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X2Pg4BBDgxDm; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 05:44:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCC491A0377; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 05:44:20 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
Subject: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-uri-get-off-my-lawn-04.txt> (URI Design and Ownership) to Best Current Practice
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 5.3.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Sender: iesg-secretary@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20140423124420.16675.61666.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 05:44:20 -0700
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-announce/batIsvPmOu99gmbacEQQmCx4gRk
Cc: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf-announce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org
List-Id: "IETF announcement list. No discussions." <ietf-announce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-announce>, <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-announce/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-announce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce>, <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 12:44:23 -0000

The IESG has received a request from the Applications Area Working Group
WG (appsawg) to consider the following document:
- 'URI Design and Ownership'
  <draft-ietf-appsawg-uri-get-off-my-lawn-04.txt> as Best Current
Practice

The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2014-05-07. Exceptionally, comments may be
sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the
beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.

Abstract


   RFC3986 Section 1.1.1 defines URI syntax as "a federated and
   extensible naming system wherein each scheme's specification may
   further restrict the syntax and semantics of identifiers using that
   scheme."  In other words, the structure of a URI is defined by its
   scheme.  While it is common for schemes to further delegate their
   substructure to the URI's owner, publishing independent standards
   that mandate particular forms of URI substructure is inappropriate,
   because that essentially usurps ownership.  This document further
   describes this problematic practice and provides some acceptable
   alternatives for use in standards.




The file can be obtained via
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-uri-get-off-my-lawn/

IESG discussion can be tracked via
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-uri-get-off-my-lawn/ballot/


No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.