Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-dolmatov-kuznyechik-05

The IESG <> Mon, 08 February 2016 22:33 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C1571B3432; Mon, 8 Feb 2016 14:33:49 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: The IESG <>
To:, Nevil Brownlee <>,
Subject: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-dolmatov-kuznyechik-05
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.14.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <>
Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2016 14:33:49 -0800
Archived-At: <>
Cc:, The IESG <>, IETF-Announce <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
List-Id: "IETF announcement list. No discussions." <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2016 22:33:49 -0000

The IESG has completed a review of draft-dolmatov-kuznyechik-05
consistent with RFC5742.

The IESG has no problem with the publication of 'GOST R 34.12-2015: Block
Cipher "Kuznyechik"' <draft-dolmatov-kuznyechik-05.txt> as an
Informational RFC.

The IESG has concluded that there is no conflict between this document
and IETF work.

The IESG would also like the Independent Submissions Editor to review the
comments in the datatracker related to this document and determine
whether or not they merit incorporation into the document. Comments may
exist in both the ballot and the history log.

The IESG review is documented at:

A URL of the reviewed Internet Draft is:

The process for such documents is described at 

Thank you,

The IESG Secretary