RFC 5166 on Metrics for the Evaluation of Congestion Control Mechanisms
rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Fri, 21 March 2008 23:38 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-announce-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ietf-announce-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-announce-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD45528C788; Fri, 21 Mar 2008 16:38:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.264, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, RDNS_NONE=0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nJA51zFGwQsT; Fri, 21 Mar 2008 16:38:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB92A28C5B0; Fri, 21 Mar 2008 16:36:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ietf-announce@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-announce@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDB0C28C679 for <ietf-announce@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Mar 2008 16:36:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qZRLAS8Xxp14 for <ietf-announce@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Mar 2008 16:36:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bosco.isi.edu (bosco.isi.edu [128.9.168.207]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C2F028C672 for <ietf-announce@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Mar 2008 16:35:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by bosco.isi.edu (Postfix, from userid 70) id D169E12068A; Fri, 21 Mar 2008 16:33:41 -0700 (PDT)
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Subject: RFC 5166 on Metrics for the Evaluation of Congestion Control Mechanisms
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Message-Id: <20080321233341.D169E12068A@bosco.isi.edu>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 16:33:41 -0700
Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
X-BeenThere: ietf-announce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Announcements <ietf-announce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce>, <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-announce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce>, <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ietf-announce-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-announce-bounces@ietf.org
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 5166 Title: Metrics for the Evaluation of Congestion Control Mechanisms Author: S. Floyd, Ed. Status: Informational Date: March 2008 Mailbox: floyd@icir.org Pages: 23 Characters: 53609 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-irtf-tmrg-metrics-11.txt URL: http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5166.txt This document discusses the metrics to be considered in an evaluation of new or modified congestion control mechanisms for the Internet. These include metrics for the evaluation of new transport protocols, of proposed modifications to TCP, of application-level congestion control, and of Active Queue Management (AQM) mechanisms in the router. This document is the first in a series of documents aimed at improving the models that we use in the evaluation of transport protocols. This document is a product of the Transport Modeling Research Group (TMRG), and has received detailed feedback from many members of the Research Group (RG). As the document tries to make clear, there is not necessarily a consensus within the research community (or the IETF community, the vendor community, the operations community, or any other community) about the metrics that congestion control mechanisms should be designed to optimize, in terms of trade-offs between throughput and delay, fairness between competing flows, and the like. However, we believe that there is a clear consensus that congestion control mechanisms should be evaluated in terms of trade-offs between a range of metrics, rather than in terms of optimizing for a single metric. This memo provides information for the Internet community. This document is a product of the IRTF Working Group of the IETF. INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF list and the RFC-DIST list. Requests to be added to or deleted from the IETF distribution list should be sent to IETF-REQUEST@IETF.ORG. Requests to be added to or deleted from the RFC-DIST distribution list should be sent to RFC-DIST-REQUEST@RFC-EDITOR.ORG. Details on obtaining RFCs via FTP or EMAIL may be obtained by sending an EMAIL message to rfc-info@RFC-EDITOR.ORG with the message body help: ways_to_get_rfcs. For example: To: rfc-info@RFC-EDITOR.ORG Subject: getting rfcs help: ways_to_get_rfcs Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to RFC-Manager@RFC-EDITOR.ORG. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. Submissions for Requests for Comments should be sent to RFC-EDITOR@RFC-EDITOR.ORG. Please consult RFC 2223, Instructions to RFC Authors, for further information. The RFC Editor Team USC/Information Sciences Institute ... _______________________________________________ IETF-Announce mailing list IETF-Announce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce