Protocol Action: 'Rapid Synchronisation of RTP Flows' to Proposed Standard

The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> Mon, 12 July 2010 18:41 UTC

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
Subject: Protocol Action: 'Rapid Synchronisation of RTP Flows' to Proposed Standard
Message-Id: <20100712184146.E5E653A6C39@core3.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 11:41:46 -0700
Cc: Internet Architecture Board <iab@iab.org>, avt mailing list <avt@ietf.org>, avt chair <avt-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Precedence: list

The IESG has approved the following document:

- 'Rapid Synchronisation of RTP Flows '
   <draft-ietf-avt-rapid-rtp-sync-12.txt> as a Proposed Standard


This document is the product of the Audio/Video Transport Working Group. 

The IESG contact persons are Robert Sparks and Gonzalo Camarillo.

A URL of this Internet-Draft is:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-avt-rapid-rtp-sync-12.txt

Technical Summary
 
This memo outlines how RTP sessions are synchronised, and discusses how
rapidly such synchronisation can occur.  We show that most RTP sessions
can be synchronised immediately, but that the use of video switching
multipoint conference units (MCUs) or large source specific multicast
(SSM) groups can greatly increase the synchronization delay.  This
increase in delay can be unacceptable to some applications that use
layered and/or multi-description codecs.

This memo introduces three mechanisms to reduce the synchronisation delay
for such sessions.  First, it updates the RTP Control Protocol (RTCP)
timing rules to reduce the initial synchronisation delay for SSM sessions.

  Second, a new feedback packet is defined for use with the Extended RTP
Profile for RTCP-based Feedback (RTP/AVPF), allowing video switching MCUs
to rapidly request resynchronisation.  Finally, new RTP header extensions
are defined to allow rapid synchronisation of late joiners, and guarantee
correct timestamp based decoding order recovery for layered codecs in the
presence of clock skew.

Working Group Summary
 
There is nothing specific to note.
 
Document Quality
    
This document explains and updates the timing consideration for RTCP in
RFC 3550. It also defines new protocol that is referenced by other
documents like payload specification for H.264 SVC
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-avt-rtp-svc-21


Personnel

Roni Even is the document shepherd.
The responsible area director is Robert Sparks.

Protocol Action: 'Rapid Synchronisation of RTP Fl… The IESG