RFC 5606 on Implications of 'retransmission-allowed' for SIP Location Conveyance
rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Mon, 24 August 2009 23:46 UTC
Return-Path: <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-announce@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-announce@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 186E83A6D22; Mon, 24 Aug 2009 16:46:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -16.881
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.881 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.718, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_DEF_WHITELIST=-15]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 77ogxidBI0mY; Mon, 24 Aug 2009 16:46:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bosco.isi.edu (bosco.isi.edu [128.9.168.207]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E80C3A69F1; Mon, 24 Aug 2009 16:46:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by bosco.isi.edu (Postfix, from userid 70) id 2365030F52A; Mon, 24 Aug 2009 16:46:10 -0700 (PDT)
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Subject: RFC 5606 on Implications of 'retransmission-allowed' for SIP Location Conveyance
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Message-Id: <20090824234610.2365030F52A@bosco.isi.edu>
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 16:46:10 -0700
Cc: geopriv@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
X-BeenThere: ietf-announce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IETF announcement list. No discussions." <ietf-announce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce>, <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-announce>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-announce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce>, <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 23:46:17 -0000
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
RFC 5606
Title: Implications of 'retransmission-allowed' for SIP
Location Conveyance
Author: J. Peterson, T. Hardie,
J. Morris
Status: Informational
Date: August 2009
Mailbox: jon.peterson@neustar.biz,
hardie@qualcomm.com,
jmorris@cdt.org
Pages: 11
Characters: 27960
Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None
I-D Tag: draft-ietf-geopriv-sip-lo-retransmission-02.txt
URL: http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5606.txt
This document explores an ambiguity in the interpretation of the
<retransmission-allowed> element of the Presence Information Data
Format for Location Objects (PIDF-LO) in cases where PIDF-LO is
conveyed by the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP). It provides
recommendations for how the SIP location conveyance mechanism should
adapt to this ambiguity.
Documents standardizing the SIP location conveyance mechanisms will
be Standards-Track documents processed according to the usual SIP
process. This document is intended primarily to provide the SIP
working group with a statement of the consensus of the GEOPRIV
working group on this topic. It secondarily provides tutorial
information on the problem space for the general reader. This
memo provides information for the Internet community.
This document is a product of the Geographic Location/Privacy Working Group of the IETF.
INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community.
It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of
this memo is unlimited.
This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
http://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
For searching the RFC series, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfcsearch.html.
For downloading RFCs, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc.html.
Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.
The RFC Editor Team
USC/Information Sciences Institute