Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-zulr-mpls-tp-linear-protection-switching-12

The IESG <> Mon, 31 March 2014 20:16 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA27C1A6FBB; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 13:16:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 67LFmy99czeQ; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 13:16:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id A257C1A6FB9; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 13:16:24 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: The IESG <>
To: Nevil Brownlee <>,
Subject: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-zulr-mpls-tp-linear-protection-switching-12
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 5.2.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 13:16:24 -0700
Cc:, The IESG <>,
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
List-Id: "IETF announcement list. No discussions." <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 20:16:27 -0000

The IESG has completed a review of
draft-zulr-mpls-tp-linear-protection-switching-12 consistent with

The IESG has no problem with the publication of 'Pre-standard Linear
Protection Switching in MPLS-TP'
<draft-zulr-mpls-tp-linear-protection-switching-12.txt> as an
Informational RFC.

The IESG has concluded that this work is related to IETF work done
in the MPLS WG and PWE3 WG, but this relationship does not prevent

The IESG requests that this document is not published as an RFC before
draft-ietf-mpls-tp-psc-itu and draft-ietf-mpls-psc-updates which, along
with RFC 6378 contain an IETF consensus approach to the same topic.

The IESG would also like the RFC-Editor to review the comments in the
datatracker related to this document and determine whether or not they
merit incorporation into the document. Comments may exist in both the
ballot and the history log.

The IESG review is documented at:

A URL of the reviewed Internet Draft is:

The process for such documents is described at 

Thank you,

The IESG Secretary