Correction: Re: Informational RFC to be: draft-mohali-diversion-history-info-07.txt

The IESG <iesg@ietf.org> Mon, 19 July 2010 16:17 UTC

From: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
To: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org
Subject: Correction: Re: Informational RFC to be: draft-mohali-diversion-history-info-07.txt
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <20100719161721.661D43A693E@core3.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 09:17:21 -0700
Cc: iana@iana.org, iesg@ietf.org, ietf-announce@ietf.org
Precedence: list

The IESG has no problem with the publication of 'Mapping and interworking
of Diversion information Between Diversion and History-Info Headers in the
Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)'
<draft-mohali-diversion-history-info-07.txt> as an Informational RFC.

The IESG would also like the RFC-Editor to review the comments in
the datatracker
(https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_id&dTag=17585&rfc_flag=0)
related to this document and determine whether or not they merit
incorporation into the document. Comments may exist in both the ballot
and the comment log.

The IESG contact person is Robert Sparks.

A URL of this Internet-Draft is:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-mohali-diversion-history-info-07.txt

The process for such documents is described at
http://www.rfc-editor.org/indsubs.html.

Thank you,

The IESG Secretary

Technical Summary

This document describes a recommended interworking guideline between
the Diversion header and the History-Info header to handle call
diversion information. In addition, an interworking policy is
proposed to manage the headers coexistence.

Working Group Summary

This is an RFC-editor independent submission.

Document Quality

This is an RFC-editor independent submission.

Personnel

Robert Sparks was the responsible AD for the RFC 5742
review.

RFC Editor Note

The IESG has concluded that this work is related to IETF work done
in the SIP and SIPCORE working groups, but this relationship does
not prevent publishing.

Correction: Re: Informational RFC to be: draft-mo… The IESG