Document Action: 'Unanswered Questions in the Path Computation Element Architecture' to Informational RFC (draft-ietf-pce-questions-08.txt)
The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> Mon, 06 October 2014 18:28 UTC
Return-Path: <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-announce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-announce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3C081A87AF; Mon, 6 Oct 2014 11:28:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 86rfrgUdFc5p; Mon, 6 Oct 2014 11:28:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D4AC1A87C8; Mon, 6 Oct 2014 11:28:10 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
Subject: Document Action: 'Unanswered Questions in the Path Computation Element Architecture' to Informational RFC (draft-ietf-pce-questions-08.txt)
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 5.6.3.p3
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <20141006182810.4731.4691.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2014 11:28:10 -0700
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-announce/lqoZhUxtLKCEGOuTqwnlg_M8gDI
Cc: pce mailing list <pce@ietf.org>, pce chair <pce-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf-announce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org
List-Id: "IETF announcement list. No discussions." <ietf-announce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-announce>, <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-announce/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-announce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce>, <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2014 18:28:14 -0000
The IESG has approved the following document: - 'Unanswered Questions in the Path Computation Element Architecture' (draft-ietf-pce-questions-08.txt) as Informational RFC This document is the product of the Path Computation Element Working Group. The IESG contact persons are Alia Atlas and Adrian Farrel. A URL of this Internet Draft is: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-questions/ Technical Summary The Path Computation Element (PCE) architecture is set out in RFC 4655. The architecture is extended for multi-layer networking with the introduction of the Virtual Network Topology Manager in RFC 5623, and generalized to Hierarchical PCE in RFC 6805. These three architectural views of PCE deliberately leave some key questions unanswered especially with respect to the interactions between architectural components. This document draws out those questions and discusses them in an architectural context with reference to other architectural components, existing protocols, and recent IETF work efforts. This document does not update the architecture documents and does not define how protocols or components must be used. It does, however, suggest how the architectural components might be combined to provide advanced PCE function. Working Group Summary No controversy and strong support Document Quality Well-written informational Personnel Who is the Document Shepherd? :: Dhruv Dhody Who is the Responsible Area Director? :: Alia Atlas