Results of IETF-conflict review for <draft-sarikaya-v6ops-prefix-delegation-11.txt>
The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> Fri, 24 February 2012 17:36 UTC
Return-Path: <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-announce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-announce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0899F21F882B; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 09:36:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.188
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.188 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.189, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c48ye4335Voi; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 09:36:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 817B721F8831; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 09:36:04 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org
Subject: Results of IETF-conflict review for <draft-sarikaya-v6ops-prefix-delegation-11.txt>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 3.64p2
Message-ID: <20120224173604.29754.90038.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 09:36:04 -0800
Cc: iana@iana.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, ietf-announce@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf-announce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IETF announcement list. No discussions." <ietf-announce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-announce>, <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-announce>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-announce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce>, <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 17:36:05 -0000
The IESG has completed a review of <draft-sarikaya-v6ops-prefix-delegation> consistent with RFC5742. This review is applied to all non-IETF streams. The IESG has no problem with the publication of 'DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation in Long Term Evolution (LTE) Networks' <draft-sarikaya-v6ops-prefix-delegation-11.txt> as an Informational RFC. The IESG would also like the RFC-Editor to review the comments in the datatracker (http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sarikaya-v6ops-prefix-delegation/) related to this document and determine whether or not they merit incorporation into the document. Comments may exist in both the ballot and the comment log. A URL of this Internet Draft is: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sarikaya-v6ops-prefix-delegation/ The process for such documents is described at http://www.rfc-editor.org/indsubs.html Thank you, The IESG Secretary Technical Summary This document specifies possible procedures for using RADIUS, DIAMETER, or DHCP-PD in the assignment of prefixes for mobile network gateways, so that they can hand them out for individual MNs. Working Group Summary This is an independent submission, not an IETF or WG item. Document Quality n.a. Personnel The responsible Area Director is Jari Arkko. RFC Editor Note IESG recommendation from RFC 5742: 2. The IESG has concluded that this work is related to IETF work done in the V6OPS, 6MAN, and DHC WGs, but this relationship does not prevent publishing.