Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-nir-cfrg-rfc7539bis-04

The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> Mon, 09 April 2018 23:18 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: Internet Research Steering Group <irsg@irtf.org>, draft-nir-cfrg-rfc7539bis@ietf.org, Allison Mankin <allison.mankin@gmail.com>, irsg@irtf.org, irtf-chair@irtf.org, cfrg-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-nir-cfrg-rfc7539bis-04
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Cc: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, iana@iana.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <152331588919.13404.17907518789691089728.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2018 16:18:09 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-announce/raOO443bD5XXtsdxD8xc3TCIEGs>

The IESG has completed a review of draft-nir-cfrg-rfc7539bis-04 consistent
with RFC5742.

The IESG has no problem with the publication of 'ChaCha20 and Poly1305 for
IETF Protocols' <draft-nir-cfrg-rfc7539bis-04.txt> as an Informational RFC.

The IESG has concluded that this work is related to IETF work done in
multiple WGs, including TLS, IPSECME, and CURDLE, but this relationship does
not prevent publishing.

(And this work is in fact highly desirable for these IETF WGs.)

The IESG would also like the IRTF to review the comments in the datatracker
related to this document and determine whether or not they merit
incorporation into the document. Comments may exist in both the ballot and
the history log.

The IESG review is documented at:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/conflict-review-nir-cfrg-rfc7539bis/

A URL of the reviewed Internet Draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-nir-cfrg-rfc7539bis/

The process for such documents is described in RFC 5743

Thank you,

The IESG Secretary

Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-nir-cfr… The IESG