Last Call: <draft-ietf-geopriv-relative-location-04.txt> (Relative Location Representation) to Proposed Standard

The IESG <noreply@ietf.org> Fri, 19 April 2013 23:58 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-announce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-announce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 948B721F90D2; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 16:58:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iPEOTj6kRu3i; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 16:57:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B059921F8FED; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 16:57:59 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: The IESG <noreply@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce:;
Subject: Last Call: <draft-ietf-geopriv-relative-location-04.txt> (Relative Location Representation) to Proposed Standard
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.44.p3
Sender: <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20130419235759.30664.29629.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 16:57:59 -0700
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 07:02:14 -0700
Cc: geopriv@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf-announce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: IETF Discussion List <ietf@ietf.org>
List-Id: "IETF announcement list. No discussions." <ietf-announce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-announce>, <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-announce>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-announce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce>, <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 23:58:00 -0000

The IESG has received a request from the Geographic Location/Privacy WG
(geopriv) to consider the following document:
- 'Relative Location Representation'
  <draft-ietf-geopriv-relative-location-04.txt> as Proposed Standard

The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2013-05-03. Exceptionally, comments may be
sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the
beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.

Abstract


   This document defines an extension to PIDF-LO (RFC4119) for the
   expression of location information that is defined relative to a
   reference point.  The reference point may be expressed as a geodetic
   or civic location, and the relative offset may be one of several
   shapes.  Optionally, a reference to a secondary document (such as a
   map image) can be included, along with the relationship of the map
   coordinate system to the reference/offset coordinate system to allow
   display of the map with the reference point and the relative offset.
   Also included in this document is a Type/Length/Value (TLV)
   representation of the relative location for use in other protocols
   that use TLVs.




The file can be obtained via
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-geopriv-relative-location/

IESG discussion can be tracked via
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-geopriv-relative-location/ballot/


No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.