IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ietf-dkim] Question about lone CR / LF

Hector Santos <hsantos@isdg.net> Fri, 02 February 2024 14:00 UTC

Return-Path: <hsantos@isdg.net>
X-Original-To: ietf-dkim@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-dkim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBE4BC14F604 for <ietf-dkim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Feb 2024 06:00:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=isdg.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kly97HdZejzJ for <ietf-dkim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Feb 2024 06:00:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.winserver.com (mail.winserver.com [3.137.120.140]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32641C14F5F4 for <ietf-dkim@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Feb 2024 06:00:00 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; d=isdg.net; s=tms1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/relaxed; l=3424; t=1706882391; atps=ietf.org; atpsh=sha1; h=Received:Received:Message-ID:Date:Subject:To:From:Organization: List-ID; bh=N39CSzXDHxwsdwiaZ9geuom0sWPcc/LpNe99ODGmGNU=; b=bj+1 JSuCi/e3WIOPncFgZrpR9yZe7YfHk5a7i/Q8liWry1Z1OL5yRyrIbyNuZIQHdsDH ny8Id9D77vzHhUN3ssiEtEUKhxRVVXCufo7UJsjYwqvTwyO2znSATYc2arfVsDEl m0gdwuRu7PcFNSZUmA1fu2GokX8FhbKRemxf3vE=
Received: by winserver.com (Wildcat! SMTP Router v8.0.454.14) for ietf-dkim@ietf.org; Fri, 02 Feb 2024 08:59:51 -0500
Received: from home.winserver.com ([75.26.216.248]) by winserver.com (Wildcat! SMTP v8.0.454.14) with ESMTP id 1504787712.1.2488; Fri, 02 Feb 2024 08:59:50 -0500
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------yrPRDNNMqZEofZWnfLMzP5EA"
Message-ID: <6461f231-96fd-475a-b44e-60bea7d3896e@isdg.net>
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2024 08:59:50 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Reply-To: hsantos@isdg.net
Content-Language: en-US
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Cc: ietf-dkim@ietf.org
References: <CAL0qLwaiYddreLQjkTXXdVKBPxsF7p2Mq9jqeQrfiX95GZRrtg@mail.gmail.com> <20240201180340.852B6820560B@ary.qy> <CAL0qLwYhYjEL0AOyGo+=X_tWsOKUQW9PJvkOcwTCgXYr-ETXLA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Hector Santos <hsantos@isdg.net>
Organization: Santronics Software, Inc.
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwYhYjEL0AOyGo+=X_tWsOKUQW9PJvkOcwTCgXYr-ETXLA@mail.gmail.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-dkim/424W8KUkh5fziGXsCEjKWrdDQE4>
Subject: Re: [Ietf-dkim] Question about lone CR / LF
X-BeenThere: ietf-dkim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DKIM List <ietf-dkim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-dkim>, <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-dkim/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-dkim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim>, <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2024 14:00:05 -0000

On 2/2/2024 12:03 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 10:03 AM John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:
>
>     It appears that Murray S. Kucherawy  <superuser@gmail.com> said:
>     >-=-=-=-=-=-
>     >
>     >On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 5:44 PM Steffen Nurpmeso
>     <steffen@sdaoden.eu> wrote:
>     >
>     >> But i cannot read this from RFC 6376.
>     >
>     >Sections 2.8 and 3.4.4 don't answer this?
>
>     Not really.  They say what to do with CRLF but not with a lone
>     CR or lone LF.
>
>
> Ah, I misunderstood the question.
>
> I agree that by the time you're talking to a DKIM (or any) filter, I 
> expect that this has been handled somehow. CRLF ends a line, 
> anything before that is part of the line, and WSP is just a space or 
> a tab.  Past that, garbage in, garbage out.
>

+1.   5322/5321 EOL is CRLF



-- 
Hector Santos,
https://santronics.com
https://winserver.com

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email