[ietf-dkim] FYI: Curious IPR from Yahoo! to DKIM
Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it> Wed, 27 April 2011 11:54 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ietf-dkim-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-dkim-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8D50E06BF for <ietfarch-ietf-dkim-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 04:54:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.35
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.35 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.249, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wfQNuJo97nX1 for <ietfarch-ietf-dkim-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 04:54:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ECCEE06F7 for <ietf-dkim-archive@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 04:54:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [127.0.0.1]) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p3RBrGOE015908; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 04:53:22 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple; d=mipassoc.org; s=k00001; t=1303905206; bh=aEGyenrrTTRq2Id1d/e6en0934E=; h=Message-ID:Date: From:MIME-Version:To:Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive: List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Sender; b=QX5wsUGOnBFWUJrZRxUNcSlyfT+Oqs YUT/DkY85I0aedpJ16M9uQOuoGK254tIqFjua+wOxZ6PEUafnJdriDjk6K60+mCHglM dPpshHwNqKAcFuSZNNOatHbcyjLAZyR1zMVXK7i3npvF1W2G1+805sVZrl6aZDLQrdt iBxJ/fo=
Received: from wmail.tana.it (mail.tana.it [62.94.243.226]) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p3RBr8xg015890 for <ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 04:53:14 -0700
Authentication-Results: sbh17.songbird.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.i=@tana.it
Received: from [172.25.197.158] (pcale.tana [172.25.197.158]) (AUTH: CRAM-MD5 515, TLS: TLS1.0,256bits,RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1) by wmail.tana.it with ESMTPSA; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 13:53:08 +0200 id 00000000005DC033.000000004DB803A4.00000446
Message-ID: <4DB803A4.1080007@tana.it>
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 13:53:08 +0200
From: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.9
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: DKIM List <ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [127.0.0.1]); Wed, 27 Apr 2011 04:53:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Greylist: IP, sender and recipient auto-whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.70]); Wed, 27 Apr 2011 04:53:14 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [ietf-dkim] FYI: Curious IPR from Yahoo! to DKIM
X-BeenThere: ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DKIM Discussion List <ietf-dkim.mipassoc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim>, <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mipassoc.org/pipermail/ietf-dkim>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim>, <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org
Errors-To: ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org
I'm puzzled by this message http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipr-announce/current/msg00447.html Its date is Tue, 26 Apr 2011 09:01:41 -0700 (PDT), and it talks about a submission on 2011-04-10. However, the given datatracker URL (1530) results in a 404 Not Found error, and the mentioned draft- ietf-dkim-base-11 doesn't seem to exist (RFC 4871 appears right after version -10). What the heck do they do? The most recent IPR seems thus to be `920' of January 2008, whose text leaves so much to be desired when compared to, say, the "reasonable non-discriminatory terms" made explicit by Cisco's or Huawei's IPRs. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
- [ietf-dkim] FYI: Curious IPR from Yahoo! to DKIM Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [ietf-dkim] FYI: Curious IPR from Yahoo! to D… Barry Leiba