[ietf-dkim] ADSP Informative Note on parent domain signing

[Jim Fenton <[e-mail]>]

There remains some disagreement on whether the "informative note"
contained in the last paragraph of the text I proposed on March 27
should appear in the ADSP draft.  The note said:

> Informative Note:  ADSP is incompatible with DKIM signing by parent
> domains described in section 3.8 of [RFC4871] in which a signer uses 
> "i=" to assert that a parent domain is signing for a subdomain.
>   
This would replace the Note in draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-09, section 2.7.

Thus far, I feel it should be included and John Levine and Dave Crocker
feel it shouldn't.  May we have guidance from others in the Working
Group, please?

-Jim


_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html