Re: [ietf-dkim] 8bit downgrades

Hector Santos <hsantos@isdg.net> Mon, 23 May 2011 01:43 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ietf-dkim-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-dkim-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C1AEE06A4 for <ietfarch-ietf-dkim-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 May 2011 18:43:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.386
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.386 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.613, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_72=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Qu0CtTaAPV5D for <ietfarch-ietf-dkim-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 May 2011 18:43:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6931CE06DC for <ietf-dkim-archive@ietf.org>; Sun, 22 May 2011 18:43:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [127.0.0.1]) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p4MLOeaH008179; Sun, 22 May 2011 14:24:46 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple; d=mipassoc.org; s=k00001; t=1306099491; bh=SGWH2YTtduLYs8Dk9xirPuweNCg=; h=Message-ID:Date: From:MIME-Version:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Sender; b=Sj9DZrHiZgGHzJ1+A G6jsIIXU9c9VlUCxPkAudnyL1eXSYPtvkIFXTLzP90CoHOf1Mq5sCrv+ZHKHU1SDvWq jBJdtpzmGEFpfPqtu1tApoH8muRWGExqnh0ttopcaZ10uSg84l7MTV06HfLQlaPj1l+ 7JegjB6tk9gfKGuceIsA=
Received: from mail.santronics.com (dkim.winserver.com [208.247.131.9]) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p4MLOWui008173 for <ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>; Sun, 22 May 2011 14:24:37 -0700
Authentication-Results: sbh17.songbird.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.i=@isdg.net
Received: by winserver.com (Wildcat! SMTP Router v6.3.453.5) for ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org; Sun, 22 May 2011 17:24:28 -0400
Received: from beta.winserver.com (opensite.winserver.com [208.247.131.23]) by winserver.com (Wildcat! SMTP v6.3.453.5) with ESMTP id 3144959830.16637.1296; Sun, 22 May 2011 17:24:27 -0400
Received: by beta.winserver.com (Wildcat! SMTP Router v6.3.453.2) for ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org; Sun, 22 May 2011 17:21:54 -0400
Received: from [192.168.1.101] ([99.3.147.93]) by beta.winserver.com (Wildcat! SMTP v6.3.453.2) with ESMTP id 4116284000; Sun, 22 May 2011 17:21:50 -0400
Message-ID: <4DD97F41.8060909@isdg.net>
Date: Sun, 22 May 2011 17:25:21 -0400
From: Hector Santos <hsantos@isdg.net>
Organization: Santronics Software, Inc.
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org" <ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>
References: <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F134331A5B6@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com> <4DD920F1.2090703@dcrocker.net> <4DD94B41.4020700@isdg.net> <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F134331A630@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com>
In-Reply-To: <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F134331A630@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com>
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [127.0.0.1]); Sun, 22 May 2011 14:24:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Greylist: IP, sender and recipient auto-whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.70]); Sun, 22 May 2011 14:24:38 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] 8bit downgrades
X-BeenThere: ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DKIM Discussion List <ietf-dkim.mipassoc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim>, <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mipassoc.org/pipermail/ietf-dkim>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim>, <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org
Errors-To: ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org

Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:

> Hector Santos followed up Crocker'ss passing of the buck:
>>
>> Please refrain from passing the buck to the WG. The document editors
>> are:
>>
>>     D. Crocker (editor)
>>     Tony Hansen (editor)
>>     M. Kucherawy (editor)
>>
>> If the WG was technically incapable as you are implying, then the
>> *onus* was on the editors to make sure it was writing correctly.
> 
> Given that it's been pointed out the use of SHOULD in this case
> is entirely appropriate, I'm happy to accept blame on behalf of 
> the other authors for getting it right.

With all due respect, for the record, actually it was the original 
editors/authors:

      E. Allman
      J. Callas
      M. Delany
      M. Libbey
      J. Fenton
      M. Thomas

with the April 2006 draft-ietf-dkim-base-00 original text.  Updated in 
August 2006 base-05 draft update to clarify the 2nd paragraph in 
particular regarding Unix (LF) vs DOS (CRLF) translation requirements, 
and it (correctly) has remained that way since then.   This 
unfortunate issue is with new editors trying to change it and then 
labeling the WG for not understanding RFC2119 as a reason.

-- 
Hector Santos, CTO
http://www.santronics.com
http://santronics.blogspot.com


_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html