Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Applicability of SSP to subdomains
Jim Fenton <fenton@cisco.com> Fri, 08 December 2006 18:37 UTC
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gskaj-0003Wj-DO for ietf-dkim-archive@lists.ietf.org; Fri, 08 Dec 2006 13:37:01 -0500
Received: from sb7.songbird.com ([208.184.79.137]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gskad-0006wK-SP for ietf-dkim-archive@lists.ietf.org; Fri, 08 Dec 2006 13:37:01 -0500
Received: from sb7.songbird.com (sb7.songbird.com [127.0.0.1]) by sb7.songbird.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id kB8IX4Oe000826; Fri, 8 Dec 2006 10:33:05 -0800
Received: from sj-iport-5.cisco.com (sj-iport-5.cisco.com [171.68.10.87]) by sb7.songbird.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id kB8IWmQ2000805 for <ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>; Fri, 8 Dec 2006 10:32:48 -0800
Received: from sj-dkim-4.cisco.com ([171.71.179.196]) by sj-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 08 Dec 2006 10:32:33 -0800
Received: from sj-core-1.cisco.com (sj-core-1.cisco.com [171.71.177.237]) by sj-dkim-4.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id kB8IWXI4025911; Fri, 8 Dec 2006 10:32:33 -0800
Received: from xbh-sjc-231.amer.cisco.com (xbh-sjc-231.cisco.com [128.107.191.100]) by sj-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id kB8IWWiw028178; Fri, 8 Dec 2006 10:32:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from xfe-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com ([171.70.151.174]) by xbh-sjc-231.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 8 Dec 2006 10:32:27 -0800
Received: from [172.26.0.122] ([10.21.120.203]) by xfe-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 8 Dec 2006 10:32:27 -0800
Message-ID: <4579AFB9.10304@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2006 10:32:25 -0800
From: Jim Fenton <fenton@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Macintosh/20061025)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Hector Santos <hsantos@santronics.com>
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Applicability of SSP to subdomains
References: <4553F9CA.9080705@cisco.com> <457899C7.4030202@cisco.com> <9CFCAD84-8368-4DB9-BF0B-E7B0E6A54623@mail-abuse.org> <4578EB09.6070806@cisco.com> <45790304.80709@santronics.com>
In-Reply-To: <45790304.80709@santronics.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Dec 2006 18:32:27.0385 (UTC) FILETIME=[3650AE90:01C71AF7]
DKIM-Signature: v=0.5; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=1007; t=1165602753; x=1166466753; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim4002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=fenton@cisco.com; z=From:=20Jim=20Fenton=20<fenton@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20[ietf-dkim]=20New=20Issue=3A=20=20Applicability=20of= 20SSP=20to=20subdomains |Sender:=20; bh=ynG3P3rxpjkZUMOwsGRksg+nsy1ImSgcdQx3oBvcSEc=; b=hYijaVXOMj5Vt2y7CpVaWK8DzrMWYXlCKtCAtliO1byUewmS/SkBJPVdJJE6t/9sS5JkkiZC iaP3ATyIk6HkaOcwcVX445rVEG+UdB2ARKvSjcXfynMWyhKGInRIG4kf;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-4; header.From=fenton@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim4002 verified; );
X-Songbird: Clean, Clean
Cc: ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org
X-BeenThere: ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DKIM Discussion List <ietf-dkim.mipassoc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim>, <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mipassoc.org/pipermail/ietf-dkim>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim>, <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org
Errors-To: ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org
X-SongbirdInformation: support@songbird.com for more information
X-Songbird-From: ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 2409bba43e9c8d580670fda8b695204a
Hector, Hector Santos wrote: > Jim Fenton wrote: > >> The question is simply, "should it be possible for an SSP record >> published by example.com to also apply to sub.example.com [for any >> value of sub]". > > Yes, but allowance is made for the sub as well. Isn't the specs > currently written as such? draft-allman-dkim-ssp does attempt to address subdomains, but there are problems with its methodology that I presented at the WG meeting. I know you weren't there, but if you look at the slides at http://www3.ietf.org/proceedings/06nov/slides/dkim-3.pdf, especially slide 4, it discusses this further. But this question is about the SSP requirements draft. Currently the requirements draft is silent on this issue, and not all of the drafts presented at the WG meeting address propagation of SSP to subdomains, which is what prompts me to ask the question. Lookup order would then be a secondary question if we decide that we need to address subdomains. -Jim _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
- [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Applicability of SSP to su… Jim Fenton
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Applicability of SSP t… Michael Thomas
- [ietf-dkim] Re: New Issue: Applicability of SSP t… Frank Ellermann
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Applicability of SSP t… John Levine
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Applicability of SSP t… Jim Fenton
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Applicability of SSP t… Douglas Otis
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Applicability of SSP t… Jim Fenton
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Applicability of SSP t… william(at)elan.net
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Applicability of SSP t… Hector Santos
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Applicability of SSP t… Hector Santos
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Applicability of SSP t… Douglas Otis
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Applicability of SSP t… Jim Fenton
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Applicability of SSP t… Damon
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Applicability of SSP t… Eliot Lear
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Applicability of SSP t… Michael Thomas
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Applicability of SSP t… Hector Santos
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Applicability of SSP t… Scott Kitterman
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Applicability of SSP t… Michael Thomas
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Applicability of SSP t… Graham Murray
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Applicability of SSP t… Scott Kitterman
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Applicability of SSP t… Scott Kitterman
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Blocking improperly signed messag… Douglas Otis
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Applicability of SSP t… John Levine
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Blocking improperly signed messag… Hector Santos
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Applicability of SSP t… Scott Kitterman
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Blocking improperly signed messag… Scott Kitterman
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Applicability of SSP t… John Levine
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Applicability of SSP t… Michael Thomas
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Blocking improperly signed messag… Steve Atkins
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Blocking improperly signed messag… Douglas Otis
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Blocking improperly signed messag… Damon
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Blocking improperly signed messag… Steve Atkins
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Blocking improperly signed messag… Hector Santos
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Blocking improperly signed messag… Douglas Otis
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Blocking improperly signed messag… Damon
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Blocking improperly signed messag… Hector Santos
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Blocking improperly signed messag… Douglas Otis
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Blocking improperly signed messag… Paul Hoffman
- [ietf-dkim] Re: Blocking improperly signed messag… Frank Ellermann
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Blocking improperly signed me… Steve Atkins
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Blocking improperly signed me… Damon
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Blocking improperly signed me… Douglas Otis
- [ietf-dkim] Re: Blocking improperly signed messag… Frank Ellermann
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Blocking improperly signed me… Wietse Venema
- [ietf-dkim] Re: Blocking improperly signed messag… Frank Ellermann
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Blocking improperly signed me… Hector Santos