Re: [ietf-dkim] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6376 (5260)
Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net> Thu, 08 February 2018 17:32 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ietf-dkim-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-dkim-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85E5612D7E3 for <ietfarch-ietf-dkim-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Feb 2018 09:32:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.789
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.789 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=bbiw.net header.b=lyaFZ6eK; dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=bbiw.net header.b=WTWYRJH1
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id G6jCI22Vc6ZU for <ietfarch-ietf-dkim-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Feb 2018 09:32:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from simon.songbird.com (simon.songbird.com [72.52.113.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36F68126D73 for <ietf-dkim-archive@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Feb 2018 09:32:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from simon.songbird.com (simon.songbird.com [127.0.0.1]) by simon.songbird.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id w18HVUIg005134; Thu, 8 Feb 2018 09:31:31 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=bbiw.net; s=default; t=1518111093; bh=K8g+p1Jmz3JwgrLfzgEIvngiTXmPIO8nb/fvxyRQ8gs=; h=To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From; b=lyaFZ6eKlwurIehaBuSuyJYcjGX82P/uIpMBI9MH6VUS9iO08fnY4LZdUWeh93ek+ MFzvF7m9tThHUne2yRDwU4f0NaTjaYEImPPzvWTicMcr05iFrHZmp08iBd5n92sn1Y QmDKAU6l136wtYwuetpXyLaL2XBKSeFIXeSPm3yY=
Received: from [192.168.1.168] (76-218-8-128.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [76.218.8.128]) (authenticated bits=0) by simon.songbird.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id w18HVSJo005129 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 8 Feb 2018 09:31:28 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=bbiw.net; s=default; t=1518111089; bh=VQ8uGIW5DfU7r7KEvAAfj6JXF/EMMFwDGGneHvfQh3g=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=WTWYRJH1A0H6sBmNQkjlxYi8Op7OPWi/+GH+HEfQLQHRd8SnXIKr3mNBagWH6X3Ah lIc1HQ53sQAHvxHHIl8ccIHmuEam02JodbDPddN7knTYCtm3YNVNZnALv+LjR//8z3 roMPifnQRDtDc7iRD1H8YbnDJMJryzE1mwepUyoo=
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, tony+dkimov@maillennium.att.com, msk@cloudmark.com, Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com, ekr@rtfm.com, barryleiba@computer.org
References: <20180208170511.8FD3AB81BBF@rfc-editor.org>
From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
Message-ID: <9ccd7f72-df63-7569-2002-cce3aace7c08@bbiw.net>
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2018 09:30:26 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20180208170511.8FD3AB81BBF@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Language: en-US
Cc: Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>, ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org, vesely@tana.it
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6376 (5260)
X-BeenThere: ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DKIM Discussion List <ietf-dkim.mipassoc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mipassoc.org/mailman/options/ietf-dkim>, <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mipassoc.org/pipermail/ietf-dkim/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim>, <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org
Sender: ietf-dkim <ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org>
While possibly a nice addition to the specification, including this ABNF rule does not correct an error in RFC 6376. As for header-field name case sensitivity, that is the purview of RFC 5322, not RFC 6376. (FWIW, it does appear that there is an error in RFC 5322, since it does not enforce case insensitity in the syntax, although it specifies -- and intends -- it in the prose.) d/ > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6376, > "DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5260 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Editorial > Reported by: Ale <vesely@tana.it> > > Section: 3.5 > > Original Text > ------------- > > > Corrected Text > -------------- > DKIM-Signature = "DKIM-Signature:" tag-list > > Notes > ----- > A formal definition is needed to make it explicit that this header field name is case insensitive, like all the other header field names. > > Instructions: > ------------- > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC6376 (draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis-15) > -------------------------------------- > Title : DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures > Publication Date : September 2011 > Author(s) : D. Crocker, Ed., T. Hansen, Ed., M. Kucherawy, Ed. > Category : DRAFT STANDARD > Source : Domain Keys Identified Mail > Area : Security > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG > -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
- Re: [ietf-dkim] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC63… Dave Crocker
- Re: [ietf-dkim] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC63… Pete Resnick
- Re: [ietf-dkim] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC63… Dave Crocker
- Re: [ietf-dkim] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC63… Barry Leiba
- Re: [ietf-dkim] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC63… Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [ietf-dkim] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC63… Pete Resnick
- Re: [ietf-dkim] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC63… Dave Crocker
- Re: [ietf-dkim] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC63… Barry Leiba
- Re: [ietf-dkim] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC63… John R. Levine