Re: [ietf-dkim] Progressing ADSP (Was: Re: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-06 (fwd))
Tony Hansen <tony@att.com> Mon, 22 September 2008 22:06 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ietf-dkim-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-dkim-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BED2D3A6B97 for <ietfarch-ietf-dkim-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Sep 2008 15:06:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, MANGLED_LIST=2.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GhRBg6-3wSlQ for <ietfarch-ietf-dkim-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Sep 2008 15:05:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (mail.mipassoc.org [IPv6:2001:470:1:76:0:ffff:4834:7146]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 760773A6BB0 for <ietf-dkim-archive@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Sep 2008 15:04:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [127.0.0.1]) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m8MM2wBA016298; Mon, 22 Sep 2008 15:03:06 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple; d=mipassoc.org; s=k00001; t=1222120997; bh=rHGpSDz/BMiXvA2cpBPj+eB+VbE=; h=Message-ID:Date: From:MIME-Version:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Sender; b=FGnTDy05EFbaW9pcz yWToSM1hp7eErjrUqHJyxGq6s7Sn+T7amopB20prgW4pmA8FhzcouOwtFhb2tJ4qVBV E7ZQqYXWKU+y3BkT0m21La42gaNSJ3pzgKz+zNOHQvLPmtRbpIGnSFi1+uhpvqe1BXe 2ZOT45Yykkc/5pewYdSU=
Received: from mail120.messagelabs.com (mail120.messagelabs.com [216.82.250.83]) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m8MM2pjA016281 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>; Mon, 22 Sep 2008 15:02:56 -0700
X-VirusChecked: Checked
X-Env-Sender: tony@att.com
X-Msg-Ref: server-10.tower-120.messagelabs.com!1222117370!9885200!1
X-StarScan-Version: 5.5.12.14.2; banners=-,-,-
X-Originating-IP: [144.160.128.141]
Received: (qmail 6626 invoked from network); 22 Sep 2008 21:02:50 -0000
Received: from sbcsmtp9.sbc.com (HELO flph161.enaf.ffdc.sbc.com) (144.160.128.141) by server-10.tower-120.messagelabs.com with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 22 Sep 2008 21:02:50 -0000
Received: from enaf.ffdc.sbc.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by flph161.enaf.ffdc.sbc.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m8ML2oVU019124 for <ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>; Mon, 22 Sep 2008 14:02:50 -0700
Received: from klph001.kcdc.att.com (klph001.kcdc.att.com [135.188.3.11]) by flph161.enaf.ffdc.sbc.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m8ML2ldj019090 for <ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>; Mon, 22 Sep 2008 14:02:47 -0700
Received: from kcdc.att.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by klph001.kcdc.att.com (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id m8ML2lhj010056 for <ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>; Mon, 22 Sep 2008 16:02:47 -0500
Received: from maillennium.att.com (mailgw1.maillennium.att.com [135.25.114.99]) by klph001.kcdc.att.com (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id m8ML2gSC009928 for <ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>; Mon, 22 Sep 2008 16:02:43 -0500
Received: from [135.25.190.126] (shabiby01.ugd.att.com[135.25.190.126](untrusted sender)) by maillennium.att.com (mailgw1) with ESMTP id <20080922210242gw1003sniie> (Authid: tony); Mon, 22 Sep 2008 21:02:42 +0000
Message-ID: <48D807F1.8030605@att.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 17:02:41 -0400
From: Tony Hansen <tony@att.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: DKIM List <ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>
References: <alpine.BSF.1.10.0809192220540.78269@simone.iecc.com> <48D4B149.3060603@cs.tcd.ie>
In-Reply-To: <48D4B149.3060603@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.92/8310/Mon Sep 22 11:58:13 2008 on sbh17.songbird.com
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 22 Sep 2008 15:03:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Greylist: Delayed for 01:00:00 by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.70]); Mon, 22 Sep 2008 15:02:56 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Progressing ADSP (Was: Re: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-06 (fwd))
X-BeenThere: ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DKIM Discussion List <ietf-dkim.mipassoc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim>, <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mipassoc.org/pipermail/ietf-dkim>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim>, <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org
Errors-To: ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org
+1 on moving forward with draft-ietf-dkim-ssp. After re-reading it afresh, a couple nits are noted below. Tony Hansen tony@att.com Please replace RFC 2821 with draft-klensin-rfc2821bis. The latter is in AUTH48 to be published as RFC 5321 and will obsolete 2821. Changing it now will guarantee that it will get fixed up to be the proper reference during ADSP's AUTH48. Please replace RFC 2821 with draft-resnick-2822upd. The latter is in AUTH48 to be published as RFC 5322 and will obsolete 2822. Changing it now will guarantee that it will get fixed up to be the proper reference during ADSP's AUTH48. Section 2.7, 1st para, missing conjunction: < Following < [RFC2821], Local-part comparisons are case sensitive, domain < comparisons are case insensitive. -- > Following > [RFC2821], Local-part comparisons are case sensitive, and domain > comparisons are case insensitive. Section 4.1, 3rd para, missing space: < ADSP records MUST NOT be published at any location other than < the_adsp._domainkey subdomain of the domain for which they are -- > ADSP records MUST NOT be published at any location other than > the _adsp._domainkey subdomain of the domain for which they are Section 4.2.1, 1st para, should eliminate record starting with "dkimXYZ=": < practices tag, so the first four characters of the record are < lower case "dkim". -- > practices tag, so the first four characters of the record are > lower case "dkim", followed by optional whitespace and "=". Section 4.2.1, 6th para, clarity: < a path without access to a signing key, or other reason, the -- > a path without access to a signing key, or any other reason, the or > a path without access to a signing key, or another reason, the Stephen Farrell wrote: > Thanks John, > > So this means that we're not taking on board the various > suggestions in Doug's draft since they didn't garner > any real support. I think that's correct, but just in > case - if there's a whole bunch of folks out there who > agree with Doug's draft so much that they think we > should not progress ADSP - now's your last chance > (in the WG) to say so. > > It might be no harm if folks who do think ADSP should > go ahead would respond to this saying so. I'm sure that > Doug will (quite reasonably) bring up his concerns again > at IETF LC, so being crystal clear here might be no > harm. > > I'll give folks the weekend to check that and for any > new typos then send the publication request to Pasi. > > Thanks all, > Stephen. > > John L wrote: >> This addresses the various last call comments. The changes are all minor >> editorial ones, nothing large. >> >> Regards, >> John Levine, johnl@iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies", >> Information Superhighwayman wanna-be, http://www.johnlevine.com, ex-Mayor >> "More Wiener schnitzel, please", said Tom, revealingly. >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 14:17:07 -0700 (PDT) >> From: IETF I-D Submission Tool <idsubmission@ietf.org> >> To: standards@taugh.com >> >> A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-06.txt has been successfuly submitted by John Levine and posted to the IETF repository. >> >> Filename: draft-ietf-dkim-ssp >> Revision: 06 >> Title: DKIM Author Domain Signing Practices (ADSP) >> Creation_date: 2008-09-19 >> WG ID: dkim >> Number_of_pages: 21 >> >> Abstract: >> DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) defines a domain-level >> authentication framework for email to permit verification of the >> source and contents of messages. This document specifies an adjunct >> mechanism to aid in assessing messages that do not contain a DKIM >> signature for the domain used in the author's address. It defines a >> record that can advertise whether a domain signs its outgoing mail, >> and how other hosts can access that record. >> >> >> >> The IETF Secretariat. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> NOTE WELL: This list operates according to >> http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html >> > _______________________________________________ > NOTE WELL: This list operates according to > http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
- [ietf-dkim] New Version Notification for draft-ie… John L
- [ietf-dkim] Progressing ADSP (Was: Re: New Versio… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Progressing ADSP (Was: Re: New Ve… Dave CROCKER
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Progressing ADSP (Was: Re: New Ve… Arvel Hathcock
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Progressing ADSP (Was: Re: New Ve… Steve Atkins
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Progressing ADSP (Was: Re: New Ve… SM
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Progressing ADSP (Was: Re: New Ve… Dave CROCKER
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Progressing ADSP (Was: Re: New Ve… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Progressing ADSP (Was: Re: New Ve… Steve Atkins
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Progressing ADSP (Was: Re: New Ve… J D Falk
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Progressing ADSP (Was: Re: New Ve… Wietse Venema
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Progressing ADSP (Was: Re: New Ve… MH Michael Hammer (5304)
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Progressing ADSP (Was: Re: New Ve… Al Iverson
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Progressing ADSP (Was: Re: New Ve… Bill.Oxley
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Progressing ADSP (Was: Re: New Ve… Jeff Macdonald
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Progressing ADSP (Was: Re: New Ve… Tony Hansen
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Progressing ADSP (Was: Re: New Ve… Jon Callas
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Progressing ADSP (Was: Re: New Ve… Roland Turner
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Progressing ADSP (Was: Re: New Ve… Patrick Peterson