Re: [ietf-dkim] Differences between threat-00 and threat-01

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Thu, 09 March 2006 17:00 UTC

Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FHOVM-0000BV-8Y for ietf-dkim-archive@lists.ietf.org; Thu, 09 Mar 2006 12:00:48 -0500
Received: from sb7.songbird.com ([208.184.79.137]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FHOVK-0008P0-RJ for ietf-dkim-archive@lists.ietf.org; Thu, 09 Mar 2006 12:00:48 -0500
Received: from sb7.songbird.com (sb7.songbird.com [127.0.0.1]) by sb7.songbird.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k29H0CvK008280; Thu, 9 Mar 2006 09:00:12 -0800
Received: from imx2.tcd.ie (imx2.tcd.ie [134.226.1.156]) by sb7.songbird.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k29H06JT008261 for <ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>; Thu, 9 Mar 2006 09:00:06 -0800
Received: from Vams.imx2 (imx2.tcd.ie [134.226.1.156]) by imx2.tcd.ie (Postfix) with SMTP id EF6F7680C3; Thu, 9 Mar 2006 16:59:27 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from imx2.tcd.ie ([134.226.1.156]) by imx2.tcd.ie ([134.226.1.156]) with SMTP (gateway) id A066EAEC40E; Thu, 09 Mar 2006 16:59:27 +0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [134.226.144.16]) by imx2.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1C77680C3; Thu, 9 Mar 2006 16:59:27 +0000 (GMT)
Message-ID: <44105EF5.6060701@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2006 16:59:33 +0000
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Douglas Otis <dotis@mail-abuse.org>
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Differences between threat-00 and threat-01
References: <0158B0B0-1C3A-45D4-8E55-3ED9A2D71593@mail-abuse.org>
In-Reply-To: <0158B0B0-1C3A-45D4-8E55-3ED9A2D71593@mail-abuse.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-AntiVirus-Status: MessageID = A166EAEC40E
X-AntiVirus-Status: Host: imx2.tcd.ie
X-AntiVirus-Status: Action Taken:
X-AntiVirus-Status: NONE
X-AntiVirus-Status: Checked by TCD Vexira. (version=1.56.3 VDF=8.1104)
X-Songbird: Found to be clean, Found to be clean
Cc: IETF-DKIM <ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DKIM Discussion List <ietf-dkim.mipassoc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim>, <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mipassoc.org/pipermail/ietf-dkim>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim>, <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org
Errors-To: ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org
X-SongbirdInformation: support@songbird.com for more information
X-Songbird-From: ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: d6b246023072368de71562c0ab503126


Douglas Otis wrote:
> Here is a link that highlights the changes being made to the existing 
> threat draft.
> 
> http://www.sonic.net/~dougotis/dkim/draft-ietf-dkim-threat-01-diff.html

Thanks Doug. Note that the same, and additional, diff outputs are also
available at the IETF tools site [1].

Stephen.

[1] http://tools.ietf.org/wg/dkim/draft-ietf-dkim-threats/


_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html