IETF Logo Mail Archive

[ietf-dkim] Re: Additional per user policy requirments

Frank Ellermann <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de> Wed, 06 September 2006 03:39 UTC

Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GKoFi-0008Qn-GM for ietf-dkim-archive@lists.ietf.org; Tue, 05 Sep 2006 23:39:02 -0400
Received: from sb7.songbird.com ([208.184.79.137]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GKoFf-0001r7-PF for ietf-dkim-archive@lists.ietf.org; Tue, 05 Sep 2006 23:39:02 -0400
Received: from sb7.songbird.com (sb7.songbird.com [127.0.0.1]) by sb7.songbird.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k863bDBI020197; Tue, 5 Sep 2006 20:37:16 -0700
Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by sb7.songbird.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k863b41E020175 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>; Tue, 5 Sep 2006 20:37:06 -0700
Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1GKoDQ-0005PO-6n for ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org; Wed, 06 Sep 2006 05:36:40 +0200
Received: from pd9fba8f5.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([217.251.168.245]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>; Wed, 06 Sep 2006 05:36:40 +0200
Received: from nobody by pd9fba8f5.dip0.t-ipconnect.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>; Wed, 06 Sep 2006 05:36:40 +0200
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org
From: Frank Ellermann <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de>
Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2006 05:35:37 +0200
Organization: <URL:http://purl.net/xyzzy>
Lines: 23
Message-ID: <44FE4209.3E43@xyzzy.claranet.de>
References: <44F7429A.80908@cisco.com> <C8D7F5BA-F91B-4066-9EDB-91309E4D07E7@mail-abuse.org> <42693A91-F645-441F-9DB6-BD2539A2FF5C@mail-abuse.org> <1157406595.17458.74.camel@bash.adsl-64-142-13-68> <44FCD260.19CF@xyzzy.claranet.de> <44FD1D8B.3030008@cs.tcd.ie>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pd9fba8f5.dip0.t-ipconnect.de
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (OS/2; U)
X-Songbird: Clean, Clean
Subject: [ietf-dkim] Re: Additional per user policy requirments
X-BeenThere: ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DKIM Discussion List <ietf-dkim.mipassoc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim>, <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mipassoc.org/pipermail/ietf-dkim>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim>, <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org
Errors-To: ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org
X-SongbirdInformation: support@songbird.com for more information
X-Songbird-From: ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 2409bba43e9c8d580670fda8b695204a

Stephen Farrell wrote:
 
> As Doug said that predates the WG.

The WG charter says "policy" (incl. the quotes) and mentions
draft-allman-dkim-ssp 

> once reqs-01 is out. we're planning to move back into
> using the issue tracker, so you can of course raise this
> as an issue if you like

Yes.  I fear the SSP adventure is over, PRA is bad, anything
else is impossible.  On the SPF lists folks tried for years
to invent wild and wonderful new "identities" in addition to
the Return-Path, and they all failed miserably, incompatible
with 2822, only PRA makes remotely sense.

This "first address of the From" can't work.  Maybe you could
get the RFC 2822 author as external expert about this idea,
IIRC he was also invited to comment on some MARID proposals.

Frank


_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email