IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ietf-dkim] Testing a DKIM implementation

Matthäus Wander <mail@wander.science> Sat, 23 March 2024 18:04 UTC

Return-Path: <mail@wander.science>
X-Original-To: ietf-dkim@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-dkim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCFB2C1519B2 for <ietf-dkim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 23 Mar 2024 11:04:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=wander.science header.b="L4kvUA9q"; dkim=neutral reason="invalid (unsupported algorithm ed25519-sha256)" header.d=wander.science header.b="XGMlJ0Zd"
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5193Lfm6gMNH for <ietf-dkim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 23 Mar 2024 11:04:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.swznet.de (cathay.swznet.de [IPv6:2a01:4f8:13b:2048::113]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BAD8C180B74 for <ietf-dkim@ietf.org>; Sat, 23 Mar 2024 11:04:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=wander.science; s=2023-05-rsa; h=Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References:To:From:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Cc: Sender:Reply-To; bh=2rqs+EryTyMcNTPOiI6BCKuDdQyiR/qCfNZluV/KO0o=; b=L4kvUA9qw xFS3x+SLBYA/Kb+BDzFWRtxsi6gn3BYOM8s10jswsWyfwqsvXwq0l4D1/MD5uLqwYIwxr1wUelREM bhS4ueguStU6UvGukW6vEMPkbQKmQre/BPqoIYExi4ZOhY8NuAnfST3y1amQDgilgnH0e+2oMlVV1 V1xMpPWlDgXaB4Z74Yckye2LwZTv11bAg126BTSZfGT2vTQ+q4KDmch2hm4qDTRKFrVYthqCfpq62 nr7JVL4ch2XL2fMhVm08F3qT/lse0K8NuDNHQZmqD/EdPAS/jPsdJ06nsx+5XvlfwKD+DR/Z2Lv+d v+arAGf3eHEfwfpZOGF++Txmw==;
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=wander.science; s=2023-05-ed25519; h=Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References:To:From:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Cc: Sender:Reply-To; bh=2rqs+EryTyMcNTPOiI6BCKuDdQyiR/qCfNZluV/KO0o=; b=XGMlJ0Zdk Dokr9L4cyyd6rZE20ttK8+O47Jryxcg3cSdrxI+8aSlvIQH89OM4NiLV2+27eWIig4djFgEyJAuAA ==;
Received: from dynamic-2a01-0c23-7179-3c00-159d-12a7-ccdd-300f.c23.pool.telefonica.de ([2a01:c23:7179:3c00:159d:12a7:ccdd:300f]) by mail.swznet.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <mail@wander.science>) id 1ro5jF-0009q7-Nf for ietf-dkim@ietf.org; Sat, 23 Mar 2024 19:04:27 +0100
Message-ID: <25cebd13-10a2-4b56-887a-f5bcaf0e0d46@wander.science>
Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2024 19:04:26 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
From: Matthäus Wander <mail@wander.science>
To: ietf-dkim@ietf.org
References: <65FD789C.26406.50826198@David.Harris.pmail.gen.nz>
Content-Language: en-US
Autocrypt: addr=mail@wander.science; keydata= xjMEX32k2xYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdAnfSBcaYKuP99+S+Cv7yM2MC5uDVgjDHq72XoUkvDduTN Jk1hdHRow6R1cyBXYW5kZXIgPG1haWxAd2FuZGVyLnNjaWVuY2U+wpYEExYIAD4WIQRN5cud QSNuO9g4P/vwPFqQ1RKslAUCX32k2wIbAwUJCWYBgAULCQgHAgYVCgkICwIEFgIDAQIeAQIX gAAKCRDwPFqQ1RKslBHNAP92aGE3RVTUoVtAOMVyEzC5kpipuYgwEUBGohcKJ6FlkwEAyvGn 2Cqw6T/GOCgcZb3NlOLAAh83v3GOLnbiQxzZgQ3OOARffaTbEgorBgEEAZdVAQUBAQdAMtpC ADRykYF4hU5t/d1ItWsCVcQTrUXARpFGk4s8shADAQgHwn4EGBYIACYWIQRN5cudQSNuO9g4 P/vwPFqQ1RKslAUCX32k2wIbDAUJCWYBgAAKCRDwPFqQ1RKslI9HAP908/+/2MpEH/63y93a 1WB5pcYFy9Do/b0AQjjkfP+ZVQD9EaC+bOBrNgJzHFwhJAHI0l2KD79pMSgXSllPlA0dBQg=
In-Reply-To: <65FD789C.26406.50826198@David.Harris.pmail.gen.nz>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2a01:c23:7179:3c00:159d:12a7:ccdd:300f
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: mail@wander.science
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Sat, 13 Feb 2021 17:57:42 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.swznet.de)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-dkim/fz2FxK3IkKPlFbJjy7gyA0bUD2A>
Subject: Re: [Ietf-dkim] Testing a DKIM implementation
X-BeenThere: ietf-dkim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DKIM List <ietf-dkim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-dkim>, <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-dkim/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-dkim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim>, <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2024 18:04:43 -0000

David Harris wrote on 2024-03-22 13:25:
> I now have my implementation complete: I was wondering if there is a
> recommended way of testing it - for instance, a reference site that allows you
> to send messages and then replies with information about the correctness of
> your implementation, or an application that can generate signatures for data
> you supply, showing its work product (the various hashes and canonicalized
> forms) so you can compare it with your own.

Maybe this one helps:
https://wander.science/projects/email/dkimtest/

Ed25519 is supported.

Regards,
Matt

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email