IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ietf-dkim] Urgent: draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-10 and RFC 5451

"J.D. Falk" <jdfalk-lists@cybernothing.org> Thu, 28 May 2009 19:50 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ietf-dkim-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-dkim-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09DD53A6D94 for <ietfarch-ietf-dkim-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 May 2009 12:50:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.556
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.556 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.043, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1KsH3zy4AGqI for <ietfarch-ietf-dkim-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 May 2009 12:50:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (mail.mipassoc.org [IPv6:2001:470:1:76:0:ffff:4834:7146]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D16593A6CBF for <ietf-dkim-archive@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 May 2009 12:50:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [127.0.0.1]) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n4SJoTDp003852; Thu, 28 May 2009 12:50:34 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple; d=mipassoc.org; s=k00001; t=1243540234; bh=V9ggKXo6T+0qAmg9RD9jmZU84s0=; h=Message-ID:Date: From:MIME-Version:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Sender; b=PeLZCBO1Z/3UfP815 h6KIKbWjjAd+CJHlLUBqwp8fZ20bCq1MZimLtHfH3ZuLfbQcyYg/pVJNEAc0ebo2oNT F6GH3/V8uJ9ZMJlfoBoS4nQrB6eIsG3jp5qYhh0FFRIx5ppB5z9j53qeps5r+qWFHQE G4s8N+yx9xGqI4QI/8Iw=
Received: from ocelope.disgruntled.net (ocelope.disgruntled.net [97.107.131.76]) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n4SJoFul003825 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>; Thu, 28 May 2009 12:50:21 -0700
Authentication-Results: sbh17.songbird.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.i=@cybernothing.org
Received: from rpco-jdmacbook.rpcorp.local (np34.co.returnpath.net [38.109.196.34]) (authenticated bits=0) by ocelope.disgruntled.net (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id n4SJoDiF011682 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for <ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>; Thu, 28 May 2009 13:50:15 -0600
X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.6.0 ocelope.disgruntled.net n4SJoDiF011682
Message-ID: <4A1EEAEB.90600@cybernothing.org>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 13:50:03 -0600
From: "J.D. Falk" <jdfalk-lists@cybernothing.org>
User-Agent: Postbox 1.0b12 (Macintosh/2009051120)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: IETF DKIM WG <ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>
References: <6c9fcc2a0905280647n4d7b194cu889629bca2d26037@mail.gmail.com> <20090528112925.E28552@protagonist.smi.sendmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20090528112925.E28552@protagonist.smi.sendmail.com>
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [127.0.0.1]); Thu, 28 May 2009 12:50:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Greylist: IP, sender and recipient auto-whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.70]); Thu, 28 May 2009 12:50:21 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Urgent: draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-10 and RFC 5451
X-BeenThere: ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DKIM Discussion List <ietf-dkim.mipassoc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim>, <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mipassoc.org/pipermail/ietf-dkim>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim>, <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org
Errors-To: ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org

Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> On Thu, 28 May 2009, Barry Leiba wrote:
>> 3. A few "Yes, adding this is groovy," messages would be good and all.
>
> Yes, adding this is way groovy.

+1

-- 
J.D. Falk
Return Path Inc
http://www.returnpath.net/
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email